“I will strengthen the house of Judah, and I will save the house of Joseph.
I will bring them back because I have compassion on them, and they shall be as
though I had not rejected them, for I am the Lord their God and I will answer
10:6 (The Israel Bible™)
A military installation near the Lebanese-Syrian
border may be producing precision surface-to-surface missiles, likely with
Iranian backing, according to an intelligence report. (Credit: ImageSat
A military installation near the Lebanese-Syrian border is being utilized to
produce precision surface-to-surface missiles, likely with Iranian backing,
according to an intelligence report published on Wednesday by ImageSat
The firm mentioned that neither warheads nor missile engines are being
manufactured at the compound in the northwestern Syrian city of Safita, which
is almost five miles from the border with Lebanon.
The factory, which is being built in the town of Safita, east of Tartus on
the Mediterranean coast, is in an area controlled by the Syrian regime and in
the vicinity of Russian SAM (surface-to-air missile) deployment.
“The construction patterns, the compound location and the activity signs at
the compound and its region, increase the probability that this is a missile
manufacturing site,” (ISI) said, adding that “if this site is indeed related to
SSM manufacturing it is possible that the two hangers include production line
and the third is for manufacture or assembly.”
The firm added that there has been increased vehicular activity to the
compound in recent months, in addition to a new water tower constructed there.
modern-day St. Louis, Missouri, you can find towering mounds of earth that
were once the product of a vast North American culture.
was the largest city built by this Native American civilization.
the ancient people who built Cahokia didn’t have a writing system, little
is known of their culture. Archaeological evidence, however, hints at a
Mesopotamia had Ur, a wealthy city from 2100 BCE and a towering ziggurat.
Egypt had Memphis and Alexandria, with their great pyramids and library,
respectively. The Toltecs or Totonacs, who resided in modern-day Mexico, had
Teotihuacan, which hosted over 125,000 people in its monolithic architecture.
Ancient cities seem to have sprung up all over the world, each of which must
have been magnificent sights in their day. But it seems like a handful of these
cities hog all the limelight. Though Teotihuacan may be known, for instance,
few are familiar with North America’s other great ancient city, Cahokia.
Mysterious mounds near St. Louis
Monks Mound, the largest remaining mound
in Cahokia. Image source: Wikimedia Commons
About 10 miles east of St. Louis, Missouri, 80 mounds of earth dot 2,200
acres of land, the largest of which covers 13.8 acres and rises 100 feet high.
These 80 mounds are the remainders of 120 mounds built 1,000 years before
Columbus reached North America by a forgotten people called the Mississippians,
named after the great river they lived near. All told, the mounds would have
required the excavation of about 55 million cubic feet of earth.
The Mississippian civilization is poorly understood; they had no writing
system, and by the time Europeans bothered to seriously document their culture,
they had been scattered, wiped out by European diseases they had no immunities
Instead, much of our understanding of the Mississippians has come from
archaeology, and the city of Cahokia represents the greatest trove of
archaeological evidence. The city was named after the Cahokia tribe that lived
in the area when the French first arrived, though they were not its original
inhabitants. In fact, by that time in the 17th century, Cahokia was abandoned.
Though the Mississippians had no writing system, Cahokia was clearly the
product of some kind of centralized planning. Its many great mounds are a
testament to that, as well as the 50-acre leveled plain of the city named the
Grand Plaza; the remains of a copper workshop; a palisade that surrounded its
central, ceremonial district; and large henges made of wood.
When Cahokia was at its greatest between
1050 and 1200 CE, it hosted an estimated 40,000 Mississippians, more than
the city of London at the time. The bulk of these people flocked to the city
between 1050 and 1100, where they built homes, established the
Grand Plaza, and built more mounds that raised important buildings over the
thousands of other homes in Cahokia.
Life in Cahokia
We can glean some other features of Cahokian life from the fragments they
left behind. We’ve found carved discs throughout Cahokia that were used in a
game called “chunkey” that was played on the large flat field of the
Grand Plaza. Participants rolled the chunkey stone across the field and threw spears toward
where they thought the stone would come to rest. Huge
audiences watched chunkey players, and players often gambled on the
But life in Cahokia wasn’t entirely fun and games. There is also evidence
that the Cahokians engaged in human sacrifice. At one mound in particular,
dubbed Mound 72, researchers found the remains of 272 people. In one instance
of sacrifice, 39 people were lined up in front of a pit and clubbed one by one,
falling into a mass grave. Two dozen different mass graves populate Mound
72, all of which contain the remains of people who had been strangled, clubbed, and even
But there’s also a more reverent
grave at Mound 72: a man buried on 20,000 beads made from seashells, which
were status symbols and luxury items in Mississippian culture. These beads were
arranged in the shape of a falcon. The falcon was an important symbol in
Mississippian culture, typically associated with great warriors and chunkey
The city’s decline
By the time Columbus and other Europeans arrived in America, Cahokia was
abandoned and had been since approximately 1300. What drove the Mississippians
away from the vast city is unclear. It’s possible there had been some kind of
conflict with another people — the palisade that encircled part of the city
speaks to that.
Or, it could be that the unique density of Cahokia led to its downfall. Few
other places in North America had tens of thousands of humans living in close
proximity with one another. It could be that disease wiped out the Cahokians or
that the area was overhunted, overfished, and overfarmed. Some evidence also
suggests that the area was severely flooded twice: once between 1100 and 1260 and
again between 1340 and 1460. Possibly a combination of these factors led the
mound-builders to abandon Cahokia.
Today, Cahokia is preserved as a historic site that anyone can visit.
However, Cahokia only gained its protective status in the 1960s. Prior to that,
it was the site of heavy development — some of its mounds had been leveled for
farming, airfields, housing, and highways. Fortunately, much of the site still
remains, and it represents one of the few ancient cities left to visit in North America.
Shane Idleman | Contributor to ChristianHeadlines.com | Tuesday, February 26, 2019
As I’ve stated before: With rapid-fire changes within a culture saturated by
political correctness and relativism, we are inclined to ask if there is any
hope for America. If we continue down this slippery slope, there is little
hope. Apart from a national spiritual awakening, it will be difficult to turn the
Titanic around—the vessel has been struck; what’s inside is spilling out. But
if God brings revival…if we once again set our hearts and minds on
Him…there is tremendous hope. Revival means to awaken, restore, renew, or
repair. In churches across America, crowd appeal and pleasing the masses tends
to be the goal rather than calling out destructive lifestyles, which can result
in revival and renewal.
A.W. Tozer in an article entitled, Prophetic Preaching, hit
the nail on the head when he wrote this, decades ago: “If Christianity is to
receive a rejuvenation, it must be by other means than any now being used. If
the Church in the second half of this century is to recover from the injuries
she suffered in the first half, there must appear a new type of preacher.”
Tozer also said, “The proper, ruler-of-the-synagogue type will never do.
Neither will the priestly type of man who carries out his duties, takes his pay
and asks no questions, nor the smooth-talking pastoral type who knows how to
make the Christian religion acceptable to everyone. All these have been tried
and found wanting.”
He concludes, “Another kind of religious leader must arise among us. He must
be of the old prophet type, a man who has seen visions of God and has heard a
voice from the Throne. When he comes (and I pray God there will be not one but
many), he will stand in flat contradiction to everything our smirking, smooth
civilization holds dear. He will contradict, denounce and protest in the name
of God and will earn the hatred and opposition of a large segment of
Christendom. Such a man is likely to be lean, rugged, blunt-spoken and a little
bit angry with the world. He will love Christ and the souls of men to the point
of willingness to die for the glory of the One and the salvation of the other.
But he will fear nothing that breathes with mortal breath.”
Those who have been called to preach, much like the prophets in the Old
Testament, will confront compromise, condemn moral digression, and powerfully
denounce sin in the hope of reconciling man to God—they speak the truth in
love. The world, and carnal Christians, despise them because they challenge the
sin they enjoy.
Preachers will ruffle feathers and step on toes from time-to-time, but it
should be the result of the truth being spoken in love verses the preacher
having an arrogant and judgmental heart. In a sense, a preacher is called to
break the heart, a pastor to mend it; one concentrates on repentance, the other
restoration. Although there can be a mixture of both preacher and teacher in a
person, there is often a clear difference. Pastors (and teachers) aim for the
mind; preachers aim for the heart, will, and emotions—to stir and to convict.
The pastor builds—the preacher tears.
The pastor counsels—the preacher convicts.
The pastor rejoices—the preacher weeps.
The pastor plants—the preacher uproots.
The pastor teaches—the preacher preaches.
The pastor mends—the preacher breaks.
The pastor is full of hope—the preacher is full of fire.
The pastor loves to listen—the preacher needs to speak.
The pastor sees the good in others—the preacher sees the depravity in man.
The pastor desires to be among the people—the preacher desires to be alone
As the famous Puritan Richard Baxter said, “I preach as a dying man to dying
men”… as a dying man to a dying nation. The church, and our nation,
desperately needs to hear “the voice crying in the wilderness” to awaken,
convict, and restore.
All pastors should ask, “Does the world love the way we ‘do church’?” Do
they appreciate that your church never challenges, or calls things into
question? Do they like the fact that your church never makes them feel
uncomfortable or offended? Are they grateful that you never discuss
controversial issues? If so, you may want to reconsider Jesus’ words that true
disciples will be hated by the world because they speak the truth, not because
they avoid it.
Leonard Ravenhill, in Why Revival Tarries, wrote, “God has
always had His specialists whose chief concern has been the moral breakdown of
the nation and the church. Such men were Elijah, Jeremiah, Malachi, and others
of their kind who appeared at critical moments in history to reprove, rebuke,
and exhort in the name of God and righteousness. Such a man is likely to be
drastic and radical; the curious crowd that gathers to watch him will soon
brand him as extreme, fanatical, and negative…and, in a sense, they are
right…for he cannot turn off the burden of the Holy Ghost.”
I pray that God would raise up many humble preachers—men who allow God to
shape their sermons and penetrate their hearts to bring America, and the world,
to her knees.
The winds of war are blowing once again, and it isn’t going to take much to spark a major conflict in the Middle East. This week is the eighth anniversary of the beginning of the civil war in Syria, and after the nightmare that the people of Syria have been through, you would think that the Assad regime would be eager for peace. But instead, Assad appears to be ready to go for broke. If Syria can spark a Middle East war that results in the complete destruction of Israel, Assad would be remembered as a hero in the Islamic world forever. Instead of a legacy of civil war and crushing poverty, Assad’s legacy would be one of wartime leader that brought total victory over Syria’s most hated enemy. But of course such a conflict would be a huge risk, because if it went badly the city of Damascus would be completely flattened and the nation of Syria as we know it today would be entirely destroyed. And considering how overwhelmingly powerful the Israeli military is, it would seem to be a very foolish risk to take. Unfortunately, Assad does not appear to be thinking rationally. On Thursday, Syria officially threatened “to attack Israel unless it withdraws from the Golan Heights”. The following comes from the Jerusalem Post…
Syria vowed to attack Israel unless it withdraws from the Golan
Heights, World Israel News reported on Thursday.
Syrian Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad submitted an official warning
to the head of the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO)
Kristin Lund, in what seemed to be an attempt to prevent official US
recognition of Israeli sovereignty in the Golan.
Of course Israel is never going to leave the Golan
Heights. We all know how Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu feels,
and on Monday his main opposition in the upcoming election expressed similar
Blue and White party politicians Gabi Ashkenazi, Yair Lapid, Benny Gantz and
Moshe Ya’alon visited the Golan Heights on Monday and vowed never to give it
“We will increase the numbers of residents in the Golan, sending a
resounding message to all – we will never relinquish the Golan Heights,”
Let us hope that Syria is bluffing, because if Syria attacks the Golan
Heights it will start a war.
And it is a war that Syria could not possibly hope to win on their
own. But Assad doesn’t plan to take on Israel by himself.
Over the last several months, Israel has repeatedly attacked Iranian forces
inside Syria. The Iranians have been fighting on Assad’s side in the
Syrian civil war, and the Israelis are afraid that when everything is all said
and done that the nation of Syria will end up being totally dominated by
Iran. The following comes from Haaretz…
For Iran, its domination of Syria is key to achieving its long-standing
dream of a “Shiite crescent,” extending through
Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, to the Mediterranean and of establishing a permanent
ground, air and naval presence on Israel’s border. Iran’s ability to do so has
been impeded to date only by the small and dwindling U.S. force in eastern
Syria and hundreds of Israeli airstrikes that have, so far,
successfully thwarted Iran’s efforts.
Although Israel has become a powerful and essentially secure state, capable
of demonstrating restraint in the face of the many challenges it faces, this
would constitute a dire and unacceptable change in the balance of power, one
that Israel cannot tolerate and must prevent – even at the expense of
The Iranians have stated that they are no longer going to tolerate Israeli
airstrikes, and their military leadership is fully ready to go to war. If
war does erupt between Israel and Syria, it seems very unlikely that Iran would
stay out of it.
And without a doubt, Iranian targets would be among the first to get hit in
a war between Israel and Syria, and the Netanyahu administration has been very
clear that Israel is preparing for a war
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
startled Iranians and even the White House on Wednesday with a strident call
for Israeli-Arab action against the government in Tehran that was translated by
his office as urging “war with Iran.”
Israeli officials tried to soften the reference by altering the English
translation, the provocative comment was likely to further the perception that
Israel, its Gulf Arab neighbors and the United States are interested in using
military action to topple the government of Iran. It comes at a particularly
delicate moment, as the Trump administration uses a U.S.-organized summit in Warsaw
and this week’s 40th anniversary of the Iranian Revolution to try to rally the
world against the government in Tehran.
Such a war would be incredibly bloody, and the moment that missiles began to
fall on Tel Aviv the Israelis would not hesitate to use nukes on Damascus and
Let us hope that cooler heads prevail.
Meanwhile, the situation in Venezuela continues to unravel as well.
Sunday was the fourth day for the nationwide blackout, and Nicolas Maduro is
blaming the failure of the power grid on a U.S. cyberattack…
Socialist President Nicolas Maduro – who is facing a challenge to his rule
by the leader of the opposition-led congress, Juan Guaido – has blamed the
blackout on an act of “sabotage” by the United States at the Guri hydroelectric
dam, but experts say it is the outcome of years of underinvestment.
“The national electrical system has been subject to multiple
cyberattacks,” Maduro wrote on Twitter on Sunday. “However, we are
making huge efforts to restore stable and definitive supply in the coming
Hopefully the U.S. was not behind the cyberattack, because a cyberattack is
an act of war.
And since nobody has asked the U.S. Congress for permission to go to war,
such an attack would be in direct violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Unfortunately, our military is not in very good shape right now. In
fact, in RAND’s recent “simulated World War III scenarios” the U.S. just kept on losing…
In simulated World War III scenarios, the U.S. continues to lose
against Russia and China, two top war planners warned last week. “In
our games, when we fight Russia and China, blue gets its ass handed to it” RAND
analyst David Ochmanek said Thursday.
RAND’s wargames show how US Armed Forces – colored blue on wargame maps –
experience the most substantial losses in one scenario after another and
still can’t thwart Russia or China – which predictably is red –
from accomplishing their objectives: annihilating Western forces.
“We lose a lot of people. We lose a lot of equipment. We usually
fail to achieve our objective of preventing aggression by the adversary,”
Over the past decade, the U.S. military has been dramatically transformed,
and not for the better.
But even if our military was in the condition that it should be, we should
still not desire war, because in this day and age weapons of mass destruction
have made full-blown war between major powers absolutely unthinkable.
A visit between a pope and the man considered a prophet by millions of Latter-day Saints would have been unimaginable to leaders and members in both churches 50 years ago. Clandestine olive branches and decades of détente were necessary, according to sources from both faiths interviewed for this story. That is exactly what has happened. In fact, today’s meeting is a culmination of a web of deepening and expanding alliances between the Latter-day Saints and the Roman Catholic Church and its many sister organizations.
Pope Francis of the Roman Catholic Church and Prophet President Russell M.
Nelson of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints met today at the
Vatican in the first-ever face-to-face discussion between the heads of the two
During his reign as both king of Vatican City and as the
pope of the Catholic Church, Jorge Mario Bergoglio has been widening his tent
and making preparations for the coming One World Religion of Antichrist. From
pawns like Rick Warren who gushingly calls him ‘our pope’,
all the way up to signing a ‘Universal
Peace Document‘ with a high-ranking leader of Islam, Pope Francis is a
man on an end
“For all nations have drunk of the wine of the wrath
of her fornication, and the kings of the earth have committed fornication with
her, and the merchants of the earth are waxed rich through the abundance of her
delicacies. And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my
people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her
plagues.” Revelation 18:3,4 (KJV)
Now a secret, closed-door meeting with the head ‘prophet’ of
the Mormon Church, Russell Nelson, reveals the expansion of another end
times partnership as the Vatican adds more pieces to their end times
chessboard. The Roman harlot is on the move, and trading in the souls in men.
Pope Francis meets with Mormon President Nelson in the Vatican
FROM THE DESERET NEWS: “The differences in doctrine are
real and they’re important,” President Nelson said afterward as he stood just
outside St. Peter’s Square, “but they’re not nearly as important as the things
we have in common — our concern for human suffering, the importance of
religious liberty for all of society, and the importance of building bridges of
friendship instead of building walls of segregation.”
The two world religious leaders shared a belief that faith in God brings
morality and stability to society. “If we have a godless society, we have a
rudderless ship,” President Nelson said.
The pope extended the invitation for a private audience to the Latter-day
Saint leader in conjunction with President Nelson’s trip this weekend to Italy,
where he will dedicate thehistory-making
new Rome Italy Temple.
The two men met for 30-35 minutes and also discussed their mutual concern
for the youth in their churches, their concern about secularization and the
desire for people to worship God, President Nelson said.
President M. Russell Ballard, president of the Quorum
of the Twelve Apostles, joined President Nelson in the meeting, along
with Elder Massimo De Feo, a General Authority Seventy, and Elder Alessandro
Dini Ciacci, an Area Seventy. President Nelson’s executive secretary, Mark
Woodruff, also attended.
The pope presented President Nelson with two gifts, his declarations on the
family and on the Islamic faith. President Nelson gave the pope a Lladro
figurine of the Christus statue and a copy of “The Family: A Proclamation to
After the meeting, the Latter-day Saint leaders smiled as
they walked arm in arm down Via
della Conciliazione — the Road of the Conciliation — to address a large
media contingent with the iconic St. Peter’s Basilica in the background.
The most senior Latter-day Saint leader to meet with a pope before today was
President Henry B. Eyring, who was greeted by Pope Francis in November 2014
when both spoke at an international marriage summit at the Vatican. President
Eyring then was the first counselor in the First Presidency.
A visit between a pope and the man considered a prophet by millions of
Latter-day Saints would have been unimaginable to leaders and members in both
churches 50 years ago. Clandestine olive branches and decades of détente were
necessary, according to sources from both faiths interviewed for this story. That
is exactly what has happened. In fact, today’s meeting is a culmination of a
web of deepening and expanding alliances between the Latter-day Saints and the
Roman Catholic Church and its many sister organizations.
That growing relationship has intensified during the past
decade, resulting in collaborations that now have the two churches working
side-by-side all over the world on projects vast and tiny.
The Deseret News conducted more than 20 interviews with people from both
faiths around the world, from Bosnia to Rome and from Salt Lake City to Norway,
to provide a definitive look at how the churches’ combined efforts are not only
helping to resolve differences between their own members but delivering
emergency humanitarian aid to some of the world’s most vulnerable people
many at the U.S.-Mexico border — as well as working to defend
religious liberty and to bolster families.
“We explained to His Holiness that we work side by side, that we have
projects with Catholic Relief Services all over the world, in over 43
countries,” President Ballard said. “We’ve been shoulder-to-shoulder as
partners, and try to relieve suffering, trying to help people that are
struggling. He was very interested in that and was very cordial , very kind to
Rome and Salt Lake City
On Thursday, Catholics and Latter-day Saints indeed worked
side-by-side to help the homeless and refugees in their respective
headquarters, Rome and Salt Lake City.
That appeared impossible in the 1950s when, fearing their own congregations
would be scandalized if church members knew they were meeting, the leader of
the Latter-day Saints came to Salt Lake City’s Holy Cross Hospital for
conversations with the head of the Salt Lake City Catholic diocese.
“Whoever touches a corpse, the body of a person who has died, and does not
cleanse himself, defiles Hashem‘s Mishkan; that person shall be cut off from
Yisrael. Since the water of lustration was not dashed on him, he remains unclean;
his uncleanness is still upon him.” Numbers
19:13 (The Israel Bible™)
After years of hard work and preparation, the rabbi charged with overseeing
the red heifer claims that this Biblical commandment is on the verge of
reappearing. Rabbi Azariah Ariel goes on record, explaining how the return of
this ritual of purification will, and will not, change our lives.
The Temple Institute in Jerusalem
has been working for three decades to educate the public and make practical
steps to prepare for the Third Temple. After many years of research and work,
they are close to bringing about an essential element: the Red Heifer. If they
are successful, implementing the red heifer ritual will not only have
implications for the Temple service but will also help Jews observe other
commandments in a more complete manner.
The commandment of the red
heifer is described by the sages as the most inexplicable of any in the
Torah. Yet lacking a red heifer has left all of Israel ritually impure and
unable to properly perform many other commandments. The Temple Institute in
Jerusalem has tasked Rabbi Ariel
with supervising the effort to reestablish this essential Torah commandment. As
such, Rabbi Ariel is precise in his description of the commandment including
its present-day implications.
“The Torah commands us to perform the mitzvah (Torah commandment) in order
to be in a ritually pure condition,” Rabbi Ariel explained to Breaking
Israel News. “This is necessary for us to engage in anything that is holy
or sanctified. It is important to understand that impurity is not any type of
physical dirt or something. For most ritual impurities, bathing in a mikveh
(ritual bath) is sufficient. The highest level of impurity comes from contact
with the dead and to purify this condition, the ashes of the red heifer are
required. This condition comes not only from contact with the dead but to be
under the same roof as a dead body also brings about this severe level of
ritual impurity. This can typically happen if a person is inside a hospital in
which a dead body is present. In such cases, the ashes of the red heifer are
the only method for becoming ritually pure. Lacking the ashes of the red
heifer, this condition remains forever.”
The physical requirements for a red heifer are simple yet precise. This has
led to an intense search for an exceedingly rare candidate.
“We know that there have been nine red heifers throughout history, the first
having been prepared in the times of Moses and Elazar, the son of Aaron,” Ariel
explained. “A red heifer is a female cow that is red. In the language of the
Bible, red is not exclusively what we know today as red. It also includes brown
and other similar shades of red. This excludes black. All of the hairs on its
body must be the same color.”
The rabbi described a recent case in which a calf was found to have six
white hairs near its nose which rendered it unfit.
“The animal must also be two years old. There can be no blemish, no holes in
the ear. Until that point, it is considered a calf and not a cow. At that
point, the cow can be slaughtered and prepared.”
the Temple service in its entirety is dependent on the return of the red
heifer ritual, the ashes of the red heifer are prepared outside of the Temple.
“This is not a sacrifice per se so it is burned in an area outside of the
Temple, on the Mount of Olives. The ashes are collected. A tiny bit of the
ashes are mixed with spring water and can be sprinkled on people in order to
Only a tiny bit of the ashes are required for the purification ritual so one
heifer will suffice for all of the Jews.
“If properly prepared, one heifer is sufficient to purify the entire nation.
There is no limit on how much wood can be burned with the heifer. Those ashes
are also used to purify people. A tiny amount of ash, a few milligrams, can be
mixed with a large quantity of water. In this manner, one heifer can indeed
purify the entire nation.”
“Even after the destruction of the Second Temple, ashes remained hidden away
in different places, and were used to purify the Jews,” Rabbi Ariel said.
But the return of the red heifer ritual will affect everyday life for Jews.
“The lack of ashes from the red heifer has prevented us from performing many
Torah commandments,” Ariel explained. “For example, today, when a Jew makes
bread, they separate out a small amount for the mitzvah of hafrashat challah
(separating out a quantity of dough for the priests). Today, the dough is
disposed of. This is done because of the ritual impurity of the person making
the dough and of the Kohanim (Jewish men of the priestly caste). If we can
reinstate the ritual of the red heifer, this dough can be baked and given to
the Kohanim to eat. This baked product is one of the 24 Divinely ordained gifts
designated for the kohanim. There are many commandments like this that we are
unable to perform due to the lack of the ashes of the red heifer.
“The ashes of the red heifer are not necessary exclusively for
Temple-related commandments. This will enable the complete performance of many
mitzvoth we already do today.”
Many believe that the search for the red heifer is motivated by a desire to
hasten the arrival of the Messiah but Rabbi Ariel stated emphatically that this
is not the case.
“There is a great misconception concerning the red heifer,” Rabbi Ariel
said. “Some people believe that by reinstating the ritual of the red heifer, we
will bring the Messiah or reinstate the Temple service. This is an incorrect
understanding. God does not do my bidding. We do His bidding. The Jews were
given the Torah and commanded to do the mitzvoth. It is not our intention to
bring about a divine reaction through the red heifer. Our only interest is to
perform the mitzvoth as they were given. The red heifer is a commandment so we
perform it. It will allow us to perform other mitzvoth. Other than that, there
are no expectations or additional agenda.”
Ariel told Breaking Israel News that there are two calves that may
potentially be used in for the preparation of the ashes. They are currently
being raised in an undisclosed location under special conditions. Care must be
taken that they are not scarred or blemished
and they must remain separated from bulls.
“As per the Torah requirements, it is forbidden that any yoke or burden be
placed on them. When the calves reach two years of age, they will be checked
again to ensure that the color has not changed and that they have no
“We are working on this but the most important thing we can do is to keep
their location secret. If we succeed, in two years we will be permitted to
perform more mitzvoth in the manner God commanded.”
The sale of the F-35 to Turkey could be halted should the country buy a
Russian air defense system. (Staff Sgt. Andrew Lee/U.S. Air Force)
WASHINGTON — The top uniformed officer in NATO and the head of
American forces in Europe said Tuesday that if Turkey goes through with its
decision to buy a Russian air defense system, he would recommend the
Pentagon refuse to give Ankara its planned purchase of the F-35 joint strike
Testifying in front of the Senate Armed Services Committee,
Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti said it would be his “best military advice” that
sales to Turkey of the F-35 be cut, should that nation buy the S-400 air defense system.
“If they accept the S-400 to establish it in Turkey, there is
first the issue that it’s not interoperable with NATO systems, nor is it
interoperable inside of our integrated missile defense system. The second has
to do with the F-35. It presents a problem to all of our aircraft, but
specifically the F-35, I believe,” Scaparrotti said.
“My best military advice would be that we don’t then follow
through with the F-35 — flying it or working with an ally that is working with
Russian systems, particularly air defense systems, with one of our most
advanced technological capabilities,” he added.
The comments came in an exchange with Sen. Jeanne Shaheen,
D-N.H., who has sponsored legislative language to to explore Turkey’s
removal from the F-35 program.
Concerns about Turkey’s decision to procure the S-400 are nothing new. Officials in the U.S. and Europe believe
Russia could gain a dangerous amount of information on the fifth-generation
fighter should the systems be linked.
But Scaparrotti’s statement is particularly notable, as he
also serves as supreme allied commander of NATO. His comments come weeks after
the Munich Security Conference, where U.S. Vice President Mike Pence warned Turkey that “we will not stand idly by while NATO
allies purchase weapons from our adversaries. We cannot ensure the defense of
the West if our allies grow dependent on the East.”
Sign up for our Early Bird Brief
Get the defense industry’s most comprehensive news and information straight to
Turkey plans to buy 100 joint strike fighters over the course
of the program, and its first F-35 pilots have already begun training alongside
U.S. pilots at Luke Air Force Base, Arizona. Turkish companies play a key
industrial role in the program as one of the producers of the center fuselage
and the maker of the cockpit display.
As a result of the planned S-400 procurement, the Pentagon
launched a large study into whether it would be possible to remove Turkey from
the F-35 industrial base.
Asked about the industrial base, the general said: “For them I
would underscore this is a huge decision for Turkey. I have talked to them, as
all of our leadership has.” He added that there is a team on the ground today
talking with the Turks about the issue.
“I would hope they would reconsider this decision on the
S-400, one system, but potentially forfeit many of the other systems and one of
the most important systems we provide them,” he said.
One such system besides the F-35 that could be impacted should
Russia buy the S-400 is the Patriot missile defense system, which Turkey was recently cleared to buy.
On that day, He will set His feet on the Mount of Olives, near Yerushalayim
on the east; and the Mount of Olives shall split across from east to west, and
one part of the Mount shall shift to the north and the other to the south, a
huge gorge. Zechariah
14:4 (The Israel Bible™)
A confrontation between the Israeli police and the Palestinians is expected
as more politicians are calling for the closure of a prayer area that was
opened in the area of the Sha’ar
HaRachamim (the Gate of Mercy, also known as the Golden Gate).
The area was closed 16 years ago by court order after it was used as a
meeting place for Hamas-related organizations. Last Friday, Arabs began
protesting and broke the lock, entering the site.
Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered the site closed but the
police have yet to carry out that order. Haaretz
reported that the Waqf (Muslim authority) director-general Sheikh Azzam
al-Hatib requested permission from the police to bring construction materials
into Sha’ar HaRachamim for renovations and according to Waqf sources, his
request was not denied.
The Waqf has thus far refused to respond to summonses to appear in court and
on Monday, an Israeli court ordered the area closed unless the Waqf responds.
It is expected that riots will break out on Friday when the area normally fills
with Muslim worshipers. On Monday, Agriculture Minister (MK) Uri Ariel (Bayit
Yehudi) ascended to the Temple Mount and attempted to enter the Sha’ar
Harachamim area but was turned away by police.
“What’s happening at the Gate of
Mercy [Golden Gate] is a major breach of the status quo, and our demand is that
this matter be returned to its previous status immediately. There is no reason
for Netanyahu to agree to this change and certainly not when Muslims are
allowed in and Jews are not,” Ariel told the Orthodox news site Kipa.
At an emergency meeting on Sunday night of all the Temple Mount movements
concerning the recent Muslim takeover of Sha’ar HaRachamim. Assaf
Fried, spokesman for the Temple Organizations, was at the meeting.
“We are not giving up on Sha’ar Harachamim at all,” Fried told Breaking
Israel News. “We know that this is entirely the fault of this government
but three mosques have been built under Netanyahu. This time there are many
more Jews on site so hopefully that will prevent them from turning the site
into a mosque. And indeed, the government is taking steps that they never took
in the past. They have issued legal restrictions forbidding several Muslim
leaders from entering the Temple Mount.”
In order to show the government that the Jews in Israel are firmly committed
to the Temple Mount, the group of organizations has called for everyone who
objects to the Muslims usurping the site to ascend next Thursday, March 14.
The assembly also called for the government to have the Waqf declared an
illegal organization and to have it banned from the Temple Mount.
The participants at the conference also called on Israeli political parties
to demand the permission of Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount as a precondition
for any coalition agreement after the upcoming Israeli elections.
The groups also called for the establishment of a synagogue on the Temple
Mount. This project was first advocated by Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu, former
Sephardi Chief Rabbi of Israel, in the mid-1990s. His son, Rabbi Shmuel
Eliyahu, Safed’s chief rabbi, continues to work toward that goal and in 2016,
Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi David
Lau, generally considered to be moderate in his politics as well as his
religious rulings, stunned many when he said
in 2016 that there was enough room on the Temple Mount for the addition of both
a synagogue and church without infringing on the Muslim sites currently in
In response to Rabbi Eliyahu’s call to make a synagogue in the unused
underground area of Solomon’s Stables, the Waqf built the Marwani
Mosque at that location capable of accommodating at least 10,000
worshippers. The construction was carried out without permits and in violation
of agreements signed with Jordan. When the Waqf constructed the
underground mosque, they worked with heavy machinery, trucking away tons of
dirt with total
disregard for the archaeological integrity.
Part of the concern over construction at the Sha’ar HaRachamim is for for
wooden beams stored at the site. The beams lay in the courtyard outside of the
location under a tarpaulin, neglected and ignored. The politically volatile
situation does not allow the timbers to be removed but carbon-14 dating carried
out in 1984 identified them as Turkish oak and Lebanon cedar ranging in age from
1,340 years to 2,860 years old. The Waqf sold some of the wood in the 1960’s as
scrap and in 2012, a group of Jews visiting the Temple Mount photographed some
of the wood being burned on site.
The Muslims claim that Israel is attempting to change the status quo on the
Temple Mount however, as Ariel indicated, a cursory look at the history of the
site since Israel conquered it in 1967 shows that precisely the opposite is
taking place. In 1967 there was one functioning mosque on the site; the
If the Waqf succeeds in establishing a mosque in Sha’ar HaRachamim, this
will be the fifth mosque on the Temple Mount. During the 1970’s, the Muslims
closed two gates to non-Muslims, restricting their entrance to the Mughrabi
Gate. It was also possible for non-Muslims to enter the structures on the site
and that too became restricted. The hours for non-Muslim visitation have become
more curtailed as time has progressed, though the number of Jews visiting the
site has skyrocketed
in recent years.
Yaakov Hayman, chairman of the United Temple Movements, sees the current
situation as an open confrontation.
“Our holiest site is being trampled by people who have declared themselves
as our enemies,” Hayman told Breaking Israel News. “We can’t blame them
since they are acting precisely like enemies. This shows where we are
spiritually and what we need to do. We need miracles for the Third Temple to
arrive but God will only do miracles after he sees that we want it. Jews are
finally waking up to the Temple Mount but we need to take it up a few notches.”
“The Arabs know all his; that Jews are waking up and that even the non-Jews
are waking up. They see this in Trump and they are terrified. This is their
desperate last-ditch effort.”
Not only is the site significant to the Jews as the site of the two Temples
but it is prophesied to play a significant role in the end-of-days.According to
Jewish tradition, the Shekhinah (שכינה) (Divine Presence) used to appear
through the Eastern Gate and will appear again when the Messiah arrives.
In addition, the Zohar, the seminal work of Jewish mysticism, describes
an pre-Messiah war on the Temple Mount involving the descendants if Ishmael who
are understood to be the Arabs.
But Pitterson is convinced Plato’s description of Atlantis matches
biblical records of the Israeli city of Gilgal Refaim.
Speaking on US radio, Pitterson said the story of
the Nephalim matches the tale of the Greek god Poseidon, who was said
to have fathered children with a human woman in Atlantis.
Pitterson, author of the book Judgement of the Nephalim,
said: “One example that really stood out for me is Plato’s description of
RUINS: Ryan Pitterson believes Gilgal
Rephaim, or Rujm el-Hiri, is the remains of Atlantis (Pic: GOOGLE MAPS)
MAPPED: The ruins are in the
Israeli-occupied Golan Heights (Pic: GOOGLE MAPS)
“It’s almost remarkable how similar it is to Ezekiel 31, which
describes the rise of this fallen angel spawning many children and having a
kingdom with an abundance of resources and rivers as well as a military power
and then having it crumble.”
He went on: “In Plato’s account, it was the Greek god Poseidon who fell
in love with a human woman and impregnated her.
“So right from the onset, it was a god coming to an Earthly realm and
conceiving a child with a human woman in the same fashion of Genesis 6.
“Atlantis is described as having all sorts of great minerals — gold,
precious minerals — and in a biblical account in Genesis 2, we’re told the
rivers that ran out of the Garden of Eden encompassed the whole line of
PHILOSOPHER: The Ancient Greek Plato
first wrote about Atlantis in about 350BC (Pic: GETTY)
MONUMENT: Gilgal Rephaim has sometimes
been called the Stonehenge of the Middle East (Pic: GETTY)
Today, the ancient remains of Gilgal lie near Argaman in the
Israeli-occupied Golan Heights.
Atlantis was said to have been built outwards in concentric circles with
water running through it.
Similarly, Gilgal features five concentric circles of stones, built using
40,000 tonnes of rock.
Believed to date from around 3,000 years before Jesus‘s birth, it has
earned the nickname “The Stonehenge of the Middle East”.
War has erupted in Asia. India is the second largest country in the world by population, and Pakistan is the fifth largest, and they both possess large nuclear arsenals. If this conflict continues to escalate, things could get really, really bad very quickly. On Wednesday, military aircraft were shot down by both sides, there was shelling across the border by both armies, and in recent hours videos have been posted of Pakistani tanks and Indian tanks both heading to the border. Once one army crosses the “Line of Control”, it is going to be very difficult to get the two sides to sit down at the negotiating table. War is one of the elements of “the perfect storm” that I have been warning you about, and I have a feeling that this is just the beginning of the conflict that we are going to see in 2019.
Earlier today Pakistan and India said they had shot down each other’s
warplanes, in a dramatic escalation of the dangerous confrontation between the
Pakistan said it downed two Indian jets in its airspace and captured two
pilots, later amended to one: whom they then seemingly paraded – blindfolded
and bloodied – for the camera.
On Tuesday evening, Islamabad used heavy calibre artillery to shell 12 to 15
places along the Indian side creating panic among the populace on the border
where bunkers are being hastily thrown up to ease their fears.
When the Indian pilot that was shot down was discovered by locals in
Pakistan, they started beating the living daylights out of him. The
following comes from the Mirror…
The brief clip shows the cameraman approach a group of people huddled around
the stricken pilot in what appears to be a small creek.
The pilot, whose arms are being held above his head, is struck in the face
twice before being kicked in the back of the head, with someone behind him
appearing to attempt to knee him.
The Pakistani military was able to rescue the pilot from the locals, and
they are now holding him in a detention facility.
In addition to airstrikes, it is being reported that both armies “have been shelling across the LoC (Line of Control)”.
Needless to say, a lot of civilians that live along the border are really
freaked out, and on the Indian side of the border a total of 14,000 bunkers are hastily being
constructed to give concerned citizens some shelter.
Most westerners don’t really think of India and Pakistan as prominent global
military powers, but the truth is that they both have very large standing
armies. And at this point India is allocating even more money than the UK
toward military spending…
India, home to 1.3 billion people, has a conventional army of about 1.4
million soldiers. Pakistan, with a population of over 200 million people, has
about 650,000 troops. Both countries have spent billions developing
conventional arms. Last year, Pakistan spent about $11 billion or about 3.6
percent of its gross domestic product on defense. India meanwhile allocated
about $58 billion, or 2.1 percent of its GDP on defense, according to the
International Institute for Strategic Studies. India’s ballooning military
spending has propelled it to the world’s fifth-biggest defense spender,
surpassing the United Kingdom, according to the IISS.
But the big concern is that this crisis could go nuclear.
If India and Pakistan fought a war and it stayed strictly conventional, the
rest of the world would probably not be affected too much.
Both India and Pakistan are believed to possess more than 100 nuclear
warheads each and have conducted atomic weapon tests. Both countries have
test-fired nuclear-capable missiles. Pakistan also has refused to renounce a
first-strike option with its atomic bombs should it feel outgunned in a
conventional war. It takes less than four minutes for a missile fired from
Pakistan to reach India. The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists warns that “computer
models have predicted that the physical impacts of a nuclear exchange between
India and Pakistan, or even a single strike on a large city, would be
devastating and would reverberate throughout the world.”
Approximately one out of every five people on the entire planet lives in
either India or Pakistan.
So the death toll in a nuclear conflict between these two nations could
result in a death toll that would be unimaginable.
And let us not forget that it looks like the U.S. is about to enter another
new war as well. In an article that I posted yesterday, I discussed the fact that
Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev has just accused the
United States of shipping troops to Colombia and Puerto Rico in preparation for
an invasion of Venezuela. China has come out very strongly against
western military intervention in Venezuela, and the Russians already have
special forces there.
If someone makes the wrong move, it could end up sparking World War 3.
If India backs down, Pakistan will probably be willing to go to the
negotiating table. But if India’s tanks cross the Line of Control,
Pakistan may feel forced to resort to using nukes because they can’t match
India’s military strength, and then all hell could break loose.
Similarly, if the U.S. backs down and doesn’t arm the opposition in
Venezuela, there probably won’t be a bloody war in that nation. But if
the U.S. arms the opposition and decides to invade on top of that, it is going
to unleash a series of negative consequences that we will not be able to
Critical decisions are being made right now that are going to greatly alter
our future, and let us hope that cooler heads prevail.
Revelation 1:3 "Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear, and who keep what is written in it, for the time is near".
Watchman for Christ