When you have done things a certain way for almost your
entire career, it can be exceedingly difficult to admit that you were
wrong. This is true in any field, but it is especially true for those in
the ministry. So Benny Hinn showed an enormous amount of courage when he
completely repudiated the “prosperity gospel” on Monday night during a Facebook Live
broadcast. This represents a 180 degree turn for his ministry,
and it could be a watershed moment for American evangelical Christianity as a
whole. For decades, an extreme emphasis on wealth and prosperity has
virtually drowned out the message of the cross on Christian television, and
this has greatly damaged the evangelical movement. Having high profile
leaders such as Benny Hinn renounce the “prosperity gospel” would do much to
heal the damage that has been done, and he should be greatly applauded for his
Of course a lot of people out there are going to be skeptical, and that is
unfortunate. Forgiveness is available to everyone no matter what they may
have been through in the past, and we should all remember that there is
literally nobody alive that is not in need of grace.
In addition, it is important to remember that ministries are always going to
need resources in order to fulfill the Great Commission, and believers should
always be supporting those ministries that are doing a great job of preaching
the gospel. But the “prosperity gospel” twisted what the Bible says about
giving into a message that appealed to the flesh, and Benny Hinn has now
completely rejected that message. The following comes from the Christian Post…
Declaring that the “Holy Ghost is just fed up with it,” controversial
televangelist Benny Hinn, formerly one of the most aggressive proponents of the
prosperity gospel, has for the first time in his career, delivered a
full-throated rejection of the practice that made him and his family millions.
The prosperity gospel teaches, among other things, that believers have a
right to the blessings of health and wealth, and they can obtain these
blessings through positive confessions of faith and the “sowing of seeds”
through the faithful payments of tithes and offerings.
And Hinn didn’t stop there.
At one point during his Monday night message, he boldly declared that the
prosperity gospel is literally making him “sick to my stomach”…
He said that “it is an offense to the Lord, it’s an
offense to say, ‘Give $1,000.’ I think it’s offense to the Holy Spirit to place
a price on the Gospel. I’m done with it.”
At one point Hinn asked viewers “Am I shocking you?”
“Giving has become such a gimmick it’s making me
sick to my stomach,” he said. “And I’ve been sick for a while too, I just
couldn’t say it.”
We definitely need a lot more of that sort of preaching in our churches.
In the end, this could result in Benny Hinn not being invited on Christian
television as much. As we have seen, there have certainly been other
prominent Christian ministers that have paid a great price for telling the
truth in recent years. But Hinn is doing what is right for himself, his
followers and for the American church as a whole, and that is what matters.
After all this time, Hinn says that the way he views “prosperity” has
completely changed. During his message, he pointed out that the great
heroes in the Bible didn’t have lots of wealth…
“Did Elijah the prophet have a car? No. Did not even have a bicycle. He had
no lack. … Did Jesus drive a car or live in a mansion? No. He had no lack. How
about the Apostles? None lacked among them,” Hinn said. “Today, the idea is
abundance and palatial homes and cars and bank accounts. The focus is wrong …
It’s so wrong.”
Hopefully thousands of other Christian leaders will see what Hinn has done
and will follow his lead. He continues to be highly influential in the
evangelical Christian world, and what he just did is likely to send shockwaves
all across the country.
It would have been really easy for Hinn to continue to preach the prosperity
gospel, because that is what he has done throughout almost his entire career.
Toward the end of the clip the 66-year-old told viewers, “I
don’t want to get to heaven and be rebuked. I think it’s time we say it like
its: The Gospel is not for sale.”
I understand that this article is highly controversial, and I also understand
that many will criticize me for writing it and that many will continue to
deeply criticize Benny Hinn for things he has done throughout the course of his
But it isn’t how we begin the race that matters.
What really matters is how we end the race, and Benny Hinn should be
greatly, greatly applauded for setting himself on a new path
Cooper was expressing his deep concerns about so-called Christian leaders
who are openly renouncing their faith and others who are turning their backs on
“We are in a dangerous place when the
church is looking to 20-year-old worship singers as our source of truth,”
he wrote. “We now have a church culture that learns who God is from
singing modern praise songs rather than from the teachings of the Word.”
Amen, brother! Preach!
“We must STOP making worship leaders and thought leaders or influencers
or cool people or ‘relevant’ people the most influential people in
Christendom,” he wrote.
Over the past few weeks the Christian community has been rocked by
revelations that Joshua Harris, the author of “I Kissed Dating
Goodbye,” had renounced his faith. And most recently, Hillsong’s Marty
Sampson announced his faith in Christ was on “incredibly shaky ground.”
I asked Franklin Graham, the president of Samaritan’s Purse and the Billy
Graham Evangelistic Association, about this weird trend surrounding Christian
leaders and influencers during an interview on my nationally-syndicated radio
“They’re in a very dangerous place to be out from under God’s
protection,” Graham said during an interview on “The Todd Starnes
Radio Show.” “For whatever reason they have decided
they’re going to turn their back on God and God standards.”
Graham said he is especially disturbed by Christians who publicly renounce
their faith in Christ, citing a warning from the Book of Revelation.
“(God) warns churches that turn their back on him and these young men
who have renounced their faith have made it so public,” he said. “Why
did they make it so public? I think they just want publicity. Otherwise, why didn’t
they just leave their faith and just be quiet about it?”
He wondered if the reason why was so that other Christians might join them
and fall away from the teachings of the Bible.
“Shame on them,” Graham said. “You’ll stand before God one
day and give an account to Him.”
Cooper, in his Facebook post, pointed out a “common thread” among the
leaders and influencers who are saying “no one else is talking about the REAL
“This is just flatly false,” he wrote. “I just read today in a renowned
worship leader’s statement, ‘How could a God of love send people to hell? No
one talks about it.’ As if he is the first person to ask this? Brother, you are
not that unique. The church has wrestled with this for 1500 years. Literally.
Everybody talks about it. Children talk about it in Sunday school. There’s like
a billion books written on the topic. Just because you don’t get the answer you
want doesn’t mean that we are unwilling to wrestle with it. We wrestle with
scripture until we are transformed by the renewing of our minds.”
Graham echoed that point during our interview on my radio show.
“I believe the Bible. I believe the Bible to be the Word of God. I believe
every word of the Bible. I do not understand it all but I believe it all,”
We must put our faith in Jesus Christ, not a celebrity influencer. And when
we find ourselves facing difficulties in life, we must turn to the Bible
instead of self-help books.
“I’m going to keep on doing what I do and I’m going to keep telling
people how they can have a relationship with God how they can have their sins
forgiven and how it can make and have that hope of heaven one day by putting
their faith and trust in Jesus Christ.”
And that should be our prayer for Christian “influencers” like Mr. Harris
and Mr. Sampson – that one day they might truly put their faith and trust in
By Jeannie Law, Christian Post Reporter | Thursday, August 15, 2019
John Cooper, lead singer of the Christian rock band Skillet, is speaking out
and expressing dismay over popular Christian leaders publicly renouncing their
“Ok I’m saying it. Because it’s too important not to. What is happening in
Christianity? More and more of our outspoken leaders or influencers who were
once ‘faces’ of the faith are falling away. And at the same time, they are
being very vocal and bold about it. Shockingly they still want to influence
others (for what purpose?)as they announce that they are leaving the faith,”
Cooper wrote in a Facebook post this week.
“I am stunned that the seemingly most important thing for these leaders
who have lost their faith is to make such a bold new stance. Basically saying,
‘I’ve been living and preaching boldly something for 20 years and led
generations of people with my teachings and now I no longer believe
it..therefore I’m going to boldly and loudly tell people it was all wrong while
I boldly and loudly lead people in to my next truth.’ I’m perplexed why they
aren’t embarrassed? Humbled? Ashamed, fearful, confused? Why be so eager to
continue leading people when you clearly don’t know where you are headed?”
Over the last few weeks, former pastor and best-selling author Joshua Harris announced on social media that he no
longer considers himself a Christian, and prolific worship music writer Marty Sampson, known for his extensive work
with Hillsong Church, said he was “genuinely losing” his faith.
Cooper made it clear that it’s not his “place” to judge unbelievers but as a
follower of Christ, he deemed it necessary to address those within his faith,
saying that there must be a measure of “loyalty and friendship and
accountability to each other and the Word of God” as Christians.
While not naming names, Cooper warned all Christians to “STOP making
worship leaders and thought leaders or influencers or cool people or ‘relevant’
people the most influential people in Christendom.” He included himself in the
list of people often put up on a pedestal.
“We are in a dangerous place when the church is looking to 20 year old
worship singers as our source of truth. We now have a church culture that
learns who God is from singing modern praise songs rather than from the
teachings of the Word.”
When it comes to writing songs for Skillet, Cooper — whose band
just released a new album, Victorious —
told The Christian Post that he has “very close relationships” with
his church and that he takes their input seriously.
“We are looked at as a ministry of our church. So they’re very behind
us,” Cooper told CP. “It’s not true that I write a song and I give it to them
for an OK before I release it but it is the case that sometimes I write
something and I say, ‘I don’t know if that’s exactly right and I will look for
New SAT-7 documentary Sequel of Hope broadcasts Myriam and her family’s
message of hope after returning to their hometown of Qaraqosh, Iraq.
“It also is the case if they ever had a problem with something I had
written, we’re such good friends and I respect them so much that they would
tell me and I would take that very seriously.”
His reason for doing so is because of how unsound some Christain music has
become in the church, he explained.
“A lot of Christian people right now, artists are releasing stuff that
when I read the lyrics, I’m like, ‘I’m amazed that people have a problem with
Skillet lyrics’ when some of the songs that we sing in church today I don’t
think are actually accurate,” he stated. “Not to be overly harsh but I am 100%
sure that God’s love is absolutely not reckless in any sort of way. I can’t
believe we sing it in church, but we do!”
Cooper was referencing the very popular worship song “Reckless Love” by Cory
Asbury, which is sung in many churches all over the United States.
He explained that the first time he became aware of the song was when his
11-year-old son told him he had been listening to the lyrics of it and after
reading the Bible he could not find anywhere in the Word where it said
God’s love was “reckless.” His conversation with his son showed
Cooper the importance of proper theology in music.
“I’m not trying to be rude about the song. And I’ve listened to
interviews and I get where it’s coming from. I want to be inclusive to people
but when people look at Skillet lyrics and they go, ‘I’m not really sure if
this is a Christian song? I’m like, ‘Really? And you’re singing the songs
you’re singing [in church]?’
“My point is, we should have a little bit more trepidation before we just
start throwing out stuff in the world,” he told CP.
In his Facebook post, he contended that artists “are good at
communicating emotion and feeling” but they “are not always the best
people to write solid bible truth and doctrine.”
“Sometimes we are too young, too ignorant of scripture, too unaware, or
too unconcerned about the purity of scripture and the holiness of the God we
are singing to. Have you ever considered the disrespect of singing songs to God
that are untrue of His character?” he wrote.
Continuing his argument against the recent public announcements of falling
away from the faith, Cooper wondered, “[W]hy do people act like ‘being
real’ covers a multitude of sins? As if someone is courageous simply for
sharing virally every thought or dark place. That’s not courageous. It’s cavalier.”
“As if they are the harbingers of truth, saying ‘I used to think one
way and practice it and preach it, but now I’ve learned all the new truth and
will start practicing and preaching it.’ So the influencers become the voice
for truth in whatever stage of life and whatever evolution takes place in their
The “Legendary” singer also rejected as “flatly false”
the claim that no one is addressing hard questions in Christianity.
Sampson of Hillsong had argued in his social media announcement that
“no one talks about” contradictions in the Bible, preachers falling,
and why God sends people to Hell, among other things.
“The church has wrestled with this for 1500 years. Literally,”
Cooper argued. “Everybody talks about it. Children talk about it in Sunday
school. There’s like a billion books written on the topic. Just because you
don’t get the answer you want doesn’t mean that we are unwilling to wrestle
with it. We wrestle with scripture until we are transformed by the renewing of
In the end, there’s one thing the Skillet singer finds most shocking:
“As these influencers disavow their faith, they always end their statements
with their ‘new insight/new truth’ that is basically a regurgitation of Jesus’s
words! It’s truly bizarre and ironic. They’ll say ‘I’m disavowing my faith but
remember, love people, be generous, forgive others. Ummm, why? That is actually
not human nature.”
He continued: “No child is ever born and says ‘I just want to love others
before loving myself. I want to turn the other cheek. I want to give my money
away to others in need.’ Those are Bible principles taught by a
prophet/Priest/king of kings who wants us to live by a higher standard which is
not an earthly standard, but rather the ‘Kingdom of God’ standard. Therefore if
Jesus is not the truth and if the Word of God is not absolute, then by
preaching Jesus’s teachings you are endorsing the words of a madman.
“[W]ill your ideas of what is ‘good’ be different from year to year
based on your experience, culture trends, poplular opinion etc and furthermore
will you continue year by year to lead others into your idea of goodness even
though it is not absolute? I’m amazed that so many Christians want the benefits
of the kingdom of God, but with the caveat that they themselves will be the
The Tennessee native pleaded with believers to “rediscover” the preeminence
and the value of the Word of God.
“We need to value truth over feeling. Truth over emotion,” he stated.
“I implore you, please please in your search for relevancy for the
gospel, let us NOT find creative ways to shape Gods word into the image of our
culture by stifling inconvenient truths. But rather let us hold on even tighter
to the anchor of the living Word of God. For He changes NOT.”
Pietro (Peter, in English) Parolin is the head of the Roman Curia in the
Vatican as its secretary of state. He has been called “papabile, a candidate to
succeed Francis as pope.” An April 2019 article
on the Catholic website, Crux, stated that Pietro
Parolin has become “more powerful than you can possibly imagine.” And the
new constitution for reforming and governing the Roman Curia would make this
obvious. The Crux article ends with “…within the Roman Curia,
everyone will now know who’s boss: The Cardinal Secretary of State.”
I will be using Catholic websites in this writing to make the point that
there are many Catholics dissatisfied with this pope.
What is this New Catholic Constitution About?
Summary from the Catholic News Agency (CNA) website: Analysis: New
Vatican constitution to centralize power in state secretariat:
A long-serving curial official said, “…This is just the total centralization
of power in the office of the Secretary of State. Nothing can be done without
the pope’s approval, and nothing gets to the pope except through [Cardinal
Parolin] – it’s the creation of a vice-regency.”
An archbishop, currently serving in a senior curial role, said, “It is an
essentially Soviet model. Lots of meetings, lots of discussion, but in the end
the Secretary [of State] decides what will happen.”
Several curial staffers from different departments told CNA that their
congregations had returned “pages of suggested revisions,” and expressed deep
concerns about the document’s proposed centralization of curial operations…. – source
Summary from Crux: New Vatican doc displays simplified,
In its new mega-department for evangelization, the feminine genius, it says,
must be promoted in the church… as well as for the faithful who, in certain
cultures, live in polygamous relationships.
Publication of the document was expected in June, but due to the vast
response to the text of over 200 pages, publication is now tentatively set for
September. – source
The Vatican’s former Prefect of the Congregation for Doctrine, Cardinal
Gerhard Müller, has strongly criticized it. He said “the teaching of the Faith
is being mentioned as merely one random task of the pope among many others, and
most importantly, now to be subordinate to his secular duties.” The
Cardinal points out in this new constitution a “wrong and deviant use of
fundamental notions of Catholic theology…” He warns against a “secularization
of the concept of the Church,” as if she is “to be run like an international
company” and as if “it is about a balance of power” between a mother company
Fr. Thomas Weinandy, a member of the International Theological Commission
who was removed as an adviser to the US Conference of Catholic bishops in 2017
after his criticisms of Pope Francis, said there’s “no problem with making
Evangelization as the primary pastoral work of the Church,” but not if it means
not telling others of the “Mysteries of the Faith.” Without doctrine
and moral teaching, “there is no evangelization,” he continued. – source
Those “mysteries of the faith” of the Catholic church are indeed mysteries;
for you’ll find lots of doctrines of man in that system, but not many of its
beliefs in the Bible. More on that shortly.
Secularizing the Catholic Faith
It sounds like this new constitution, besides giving Peter Parolin power
over all the workings of the Catholic church, will increase the Vatican’s focus
on trying to join different belief systems to the “Mother Church” as it calls
The Vatican deal with China in September 2018 allows the Communist
government to recommend bishops of the Catholic church. Why agree to such a
blatant secular compromise?
The agreement states that China will recommend bishops before they’re
appointed by the pope, and stipulates that the pope can veto bishops that China
recommends, within limits. Francis, as part of the deal, lifted the
excommunication of seven bishops who had been appointed by China without
papal approval. Also, under the deal, two Vatican-aligned Chinese bishops
recognized by the pope have been asked to resign in favor of state-sanctioned
prelates. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to realize that the Chinese
government is only going to select bishops who are loyal to the Communist
Party. Meanwhile, the persecution
of Chinese Catholics has continued, and of Protestants.
From America Magazine: Cardinal Parolin defends Vatican-China
agreement amid criticism:
At the symposium, “Stand Together to Defend International Religious
Freedom,” Parolin defended the Vatican-China agreement, saying, “We signed this
agreement to help advance religious freedom, to find normalization for the
Catholic community there, and then for all other religions to have space and a
role to play…” – source
Francis, Parolin and previous popes have shown they’re Marxist, Socialist,
or Communist themselves and/or have bowed to countries with those systems,
secularizing in order to keep seminaries open and “fatten up the Catholic
church.” You can read about this on
the Catholic website Tradition in Action.
Catechism #841 states that Muslims worship the same God as the Catholic
church; therefore, both Francis and Parolin call them brothers and sisters. But
the Muslim god is not the God of the Bible. And then there are the Vatican
prayers alongside Muslims, Buddhists, and Hindus, and reverence for their
precepts and teachings, claiming they “reflect a ray of Truth which enlightens
At the Second Vatican Council in 1965, the Catholic church declared its
attitude to other religions in a document called Nostra Aetate (which means ‘in our
time’). Here is an excerpt:
“In her tasks of promoting unity and love among men, indeed among nations,
considers above all what people have in common and what draws them
to fellowship. (n.1) Also, The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and
holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reverence those ways of
conduct and of life, those precepts and teachings which, though differing in
many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless often reflect
a ray of that Truth which enlightens all men. (n.2).”
All this is building towards the one-world religion. No false religion will
have a role to play in salvation. Christ is the only way, the truth and the
life. No one comes to our Father in heaven except through Him (John 14:6).
The Bible, as we know, tells us in Revelation 17 about “Mystery
Babylon, the Mother of Harlots.” (Babylon refers to the root of all false
religion.) The woman dressed in purple and scarlet who sits on seven hills is
drunk with the blood of the saints (martyrs for Jesus who refuse to bow to
false doctrine). This Mother church will be aligned with the Antichrist in the
Tribulation until he has finished using her to gain power with his ten-nation
confederacy; then he will have her destroyed.
Two Popes at the End of Days?
Speaking of that destruction, Francis’ namesake prophesied centuries ago
about the time of the end when two popes are alive, one having stolen the
throne from the other – a time when the church of Rome will be destroyed.
We’re not to give extra-biblical prophecy the same credence as the
God-inspired Bible. But this prophecy and another that applies here, which will
also be discussed, only bear mentioning since they appear as though they’re
coming to pass…but only in part! Satan knows Bible prophecy too. What
better way to keep people deceived by mixing truth with lies?!
The first prophecy I’m referring to is the one by Francis of Assisi. Some
claim this prophecy was made up by dissenting members of the 13th
century Franciscan order and attributed to Francis of Assisi. No matter, for it
doesn’t deflect from what we see happening today. Keep this in mind, though:
when revealing this prophecy, Francis of Assisi still held to the false belief
in what he called the true pope and the true church, including Mary worship.
Not long before he died in 1226, Francis of Assisi gathered the members of
his order and warned them of great tribulations that would befall the Catholic
church in the end of days just before Christ’s return. Here is an excerpt:
“The devils will have unusual power; the immaculate purity of our Order, and
of others, will be so much obscured that there will be very few Christians who
will obey the true Sovereign Pontiff and the Roman Church with loyal
hearts and perfect charity. At the time of this tribulation, a man, not
canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate, who, by his
cunning, will endeavour to draw many into error and death. [Two popes alive at
the end of days.]
“Then scandals will be multiplied, our Order will be divided, and many
others will be entirely destroyed, because they will consent to error instead
of opposing it. There will be such diversity of opinions and
schisms among the people, the religious and the clergy, that, except
those days were shortened, according to the words of the Gospel, even the
elect would be led into error, were they not specially guided, amid such great
confusion, by the immense mercy of God…
“Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample
it under foot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even
by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Jesus Christ will
send them not a true Pastor, but a destroyer.” – from Works of the Seraphic
Father St. Francis Of Assisi [London: R. Washbourne, 1882], pp.
Interestingly, rumor has it that the papal throne was usurped from Benedict
with help from elitists including Obama and others that wanted the Marxist
Bergoglio (Francis) to be pope, who would be in line with their leftist values.
From Gloria.TV: Wikileaks: Clinton, Obama, Soros, Overthrew Pope
Benedict in Vatican Coup:
George Soros, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton orchestrated a coup in the
Vatican to overthrow the conservative Pope Benedict and replace him with
radical leftist Pope Francis, according to a group of Catholic leaders citing
evidence from various sources, including WikiLeaks emails. – source
This would make Francis not canonically elected. The canon law of
the Catholic church says a pope’s resignation is valid only if he makes the
decision in full freedom and without pressure from others.
Supernatural Signs in the Conclave?
I still remember the words of Cardinal Schönborn in speaking about how
Francis unexpectedly became pope.
From The Telegraph: Pope Francis elected after supernatural ‘signs’
in the Conclave, says Cardinal:
Schönborn, Archbishop of Vienna, said the surprise election of Pope Francis
came about because of a series of supernatural “signs” in the conclave,
including one which he could not speak about. He said he felt two strong signs
that Bergoglio (Francis) was “the chosen one.” Cardinal Schönborn went on to
say that he’s sure many cardinals “received similar signs during the Conclave.”
He said that without such signs, “It wouldn’t have been possible to have this
election so soon and so rapidly… It is as if he would say to the world ‘come
home, I wait for you.’” – source
The Schism in the Catholic Church Today
Even cardinals are calling for Francis to step down. Is he grooming his
cohort in case he steps down OR just wants to focus on other things and allow
Parolin to lead the sheep? Or something else. Did Francis usurp the throne from
Benedict? Will Pietro, the Roman Curia boss, usurp the throne from Francis? Oh
well, let’s move on.
A March 2019 article by Julia Meloni on the Catholic website OnePeterFive,
provided some interesting insight. Here is a summary of that article titled,
Cardinal Parolin: The Next Pope?
Last year, Archbishop Viganò alleged that Cardinal Pietro Parolin, Francis’s
handpicked secretary of state, was complicit with him in covering up the
allegations of decades
of sexual abuse of minors, seminarians and young priests by Cardinal
McCarrick. Despite this, Antonio Socci, a leading conservative Vatican-watcher,
says meetings of cardinals about a possible conclave have been taking place,
with Parolin as the clear frontrunner.
Socci says cardinals once loyal to Francis are so concerned about a schism
that they’re planning to appeal to him to step down. Their favored
candidate for replacement is understood to be Cardinal Pietro Parolin.
Why Parolin? According to Marco Tosatti, Parolin is a progressive
diplomat with ties to what is referred to as the Vatican’s St. Gallen
mafia, which wields a lot of power. Other Vatican-watchers call
him a clear “reformer” — a “pastor open to dialogue,”
in line with Francis’s “winds of change.”
Parolin is said to be a revolutionary without the wild
liability of Francis. To stay papabile, he’s been distancing
himself from some of the questionable aspects of Francis’s reign. He’s been
likened to a fireman, carefully controlling the blazes of this pontificate with
his diplomatic prowess.
Parolin supposedly was shipped off to Venezuela after a falling out with
Cardinal Bertone, Benedict’s secretary of state. Francis, who spoke positively about Parolin before becoming
pope, soon replaced Bertone with Parolin — who began loyally implementing Francis’s will. The pope,
in turn, lavished Parolin with power. Francis indulges him, and power has
drained from other Vatican departments toward this secretary of state.
It was Parolin who moved to suspend an external audit of the Vatican’s
Cardinal Zen says it’s Parolin who pushed Francis towards the deal with
Communist China to allow that government to recommend Catholic bishops, which
critics say betrays Chinese Catholics. He calls for Parolin’s resignation over
this betrayal. He says Parolin “got rid” of him, and calls Parolin “arrogant
and despotic, interested more in diplomatic (worldly) success than in the
triumph of the Faith.” In Wikipedia’s article on Parolin, a quote from Cardinal
Zen said Parolin “is dangerous.”
Parolin seems alarmingly friendly with cultural Marxists and other worldly
elites. In 2018, he was the first Vatican official to ever attend the secretive
Bilderberg Meeting, the summit of globalists with an agenda of open borders and
a one-world government. Parolin also joined Francis in promoting the U.N.’s menacing globalist
agenda. Although Parolin says the agenda must respect life in “all its stages,”
pro-life leaders warn that the Vatican’s collaboration with the UN will extend
abortion, smuggled into the agenda via coded language on “reproductive
In 2017, Parolin further cemented his revolutionary credentials, asserting
that Vatican II initiated an “irreversible” process. He quoted a theologian who
boasted: “Absolutely nothing will be as it was before!” Parolin praised the new
“seeds” of “synodality” — a term that, under Francis, has become synonymous
with permanent revolution.
Parolin is the only whispered-about candidate for pope with any real chance
of being elected; he is the smooth revolutionary, the master collaborator with
“I don’t think he has faith. He is just a good diplomat in a very secular,
mundane meaning,” Cardinal Zen says of Parolin. –source
Another interesting article from the Catholic website Lifesite News,
speaks of Francis’ and Parolin’s promotion of Bishop Robert McElroy in San
Diego. “Although McElroy says no clerical “gay subculture” exists in his
diocese, he is pro-homosexual, having defended a diocesan employee in a
same-sex “marriage,” told priests to embrace “LGBT families,” and has been
accused, along with Francis and Parolin, in knowing about ex-Cardinal
McCarrick’s serial sexual abuse of seminarians and ignoring the matter.”
Peter, the Roman
Now to the one you may be wondering about since reading the title of this
article. I’m sure many of you have heard about Malachy’s prophecy of the popes.
He gave the prophecy in Latin, and the name he gave of the last leader of the
Catholic church was Petrus Romanus, which translates Peter (Pietro, in Italian)
There is also what may contain truth in Malachy’s prophecy, but deception as
well. Satan knows about the Mother of Harlots church in Rome described in
Revelation, yet this prophecy appears to draw one in with its uncanny accuracy
in the descriptions of the popes, including the last pope or one who leads the Catholic
church in the Tribulation. There is no mention of the false religious system that
it has been and will continue to be.
Terry James said in his book review of Petrus Romanus by Tom Horn and
Chris Putnam, “Neither Tom Horn nor Cris Putnam–nor I, as your reviewer of this
book—claim that St. Malachy was a God-inspired prophet in the sense of an Old
Testament or New Testament prophet. He was not. However, I will tell you
without reservation that the little-known and sometimes previously undiscovered
facts these researchers have uncovered and constructed into an enthralling
picture of the one who will likely be the last pontiff are absolutely
Hal Lindsey reported on Malachy’s
prophecy before Francis became pope. He said, “I’m not saying that this
man’s prophecy rises to the same level of detail and accuracy as those in the
Bible. However, it does contain some remarkable predictions that seem to have
been fulfilled across the centuries and may bear relevance for today.” Hal
mentioned that some claim it’s a forgery, but he pointed out that – if it were
made up by an anti-Catholic Protestant, how does one explain away the fact that
it has been kept under guard in the Vatican archives since it was discovered in
1590? [Some claim the author was Cardinal Girolamo Simoncelli who lived from
1522 to 1605]. Regardless, it can’t be dated any later than 1590 no matter who
would have written it.
Malachy, a 12th-century bishop of Armagh in what is now Northern Ireland,
purportedly had a vision in which he foresaw all of the popes from the death of
Pope Innocent II until the destruction of the church and the return of Christ.
It is said that he gave an account of his visions to Pope Innocent II, but the
document remained unknown in the secret Vatican Archives until its discovery in
Malachy was obviously held in high esteem as he was canonized as a saint by
Pope Clement III on July 6, 1199, 50 years after his death.
Here is his prophecy of the last leader of the Catholic church:
“In extreme persecution will sit Peter the Roman (Petrus Romanus), who will
pasture his sheep in tribulations; and when these things are finished, the city
of seven hills [i.e. Rome] will be destroyed, and the dreadful judge will judge
his people. The End.”
“And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people,
that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues”
This new Catholic constitution is called PraedicateEvangelium
(Proclaim the Gospel). Yet Francis criticizes Protestants for
evangelizing, or proselytizing, as he put it. But that’s because he
doesn’t like the competition. And we don’t accept the man-made doctrines of the
Catholic church – at least not those of us who are Bible-believers – and we
haven’t joined the broad-way, emergent-divergent so-called “ecumenical”
bandwagon that promotes global unity among all religions under the guise of
tolerance and cooperation. Many Protestant pastors are guilty of the
same thing in these days of apostasy.
The most crucial error among many that the Catholic church
teaches is the following:
According to the RCC’s Canon 12, Council of Trent, “If any one shall say
that justifying faith is nothing else than confidence in the divine mercy
pardoning sins for Christ’s sake, or that it is that confidence alone by which
we are justified… let him be accursed.”
Yet, God’s Word tells us that justification/salvation is by faith:
“But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the
ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness” (Romans 4:5).
“Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord
Jesus Christ” (Romans 5:1).
“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is
the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast” (Ephesians 2:8-9).
From Dave Hunt: “For the Catholic, salvation does not come through
personally receiving Christ as Savior but is a lengthy process that begins with
baptism and thereafter depends upon one’s continued relationship to the
[Catholic] Church. Salvation comes through participation in the sacraments,
penance, good works, suffering for one’s sins and the sins of others here
and/or in purgatory, indulgences to reduce time in purgatory, and almost
endless masses and Rosaries said on one’s behalf even after one’s death.
Catholic evangelism is by works, the very antithesis of “the gospel of the
grace of God” (Acts:20:24). – excerpt fromA Woman Rides the Beast,
This reminds us of what Christ said to the Pharisees and Scribes in Matthew
15:6-9: “…So for the sake of your tradition you have made void the word of God…
‘teaching as doctrines the commandments of men’”
Though the extra-biblical prophecies may contain partial truth concerning
certain events we see unfolding before us, there is only one source – the Bible
– that has proven to be 100% true. And it tells us of a coming one-world false
church and one-world Antichrist government. It speaks of rampant wickedness,
wars and rumor of wars, alignment of end-time nations against the Jews who are
back in their land of Israel, etc. The wildly insane weather we’re seeing is
not climate change; it’s God’s warning to turn back to Him and accept His free
We brethren can rest in “our Blessed Hope, and the glorious appearing of the
great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ” (Titus 2:13).
We who put our faith in Christ alone for our salvation (John 14:6; Acts
4:12) will be caught up in the twinkling of an eye (1 Corinthians 15:52) to
meet Jesus in the clouds (1 Thessalonians 4:13-18) and escape the coming wrath
(1 Thessalonians 5:9; Revelation 3:10).
As the late Jack Kelley would say, “We can almost hear the footsteps of the
Excuse me. I say this with love, but necessary firmness. Most of you are
easily offended, weak-kneed, overly protected, participation-trophy receiving,
pampered, self-centered, worldly minded, narcissistic, phone in your face,
spiritually immature, emotion-centered, frankly useless individuals who call
themselves a believer in Jesus Christ. I don’t understand you.
You somehow get bent out of shape when a pastor dares stop his service and
(gasp) prays for a man who is being pursued by the hounds of hell and
demon-possessed individuals who want to see him out of office and at the worst,
dead and forgotten, yet humbly stops by without fanfare and bows his head in
humbleness, asking for God’s guidance, then leaves as quietly as he came. What
Franklin Graham asked that all Bible-believing Christians would gather
together on June 2nd and pray for President Trump. Personally, I
never have seen a man who is more hated for no good reason except that he
turned the New World Order on its head and prevented the female version of the
Antichrist to assume power as the President of the United States.
This action was not his doing alone. Numbers of believers gathered in prayer
three years ago for the welfare of this nation which, in all honesty, was
headed for the trash heap of history if there was no intervention by Almighty
God to do something. Thankfully, He did answer and gave us a man who, while
having all the graces of a bull in a china shop, was someone who was at least
honest and encouraged Christians and people in general to pray for him.
Mr. Trump has:
ministers in the White House lifting him up in prayer daily and has godly
people in his cabinet,
nominated and gotten approved more conservative judges and justices to the
bench than any other conservative-leaning leader,
ordered his Department of Health and Human Services to declare that life
begins at conception and has, so far, been a champion for the unborn and
has lashed out at states who feel that it is their duty to murder the
unborn and those babies who have the audacity to survive a medical
has been a
supporter of the rights of religious people to practice their faith in
encouraged schools in the U.S. to adopt Bible-centered curricula and teach
its principles to students who have as much morality in their souls as
does a cornered rattlesnake.
Right now at least, Christians in this country have somewhat of a reprieve.
It is when we don’t pray for our leaders and their decisions that lead to
persecution and the probability that you’ll have to put your faith to the test,
deciding between loyalty to Jesus Christ at the end of a gun, or denial and
compromise and earn yourself a reward of eternal punishment. After Donald Trump
leaves office, what then?
It’s not a matter of if we’ll be persecuted, but when. We may, in God’s
mercy, be translated out of here, but he may put us through the fire and
spiritually toughen us up and weed out the wheat from the chaff. Remember this,
that the world hates us whether we compromise with them in the name of
tolerance or not. The world system is controlled by the devil, who has been
trying to kill us or at least make us ineffective for over 2,000 years.
If he can’t physically destroy us, he can use people and events to ruin what
testimony we have and make us useless as a means of preaching the gospel and
being models of truth and standards in a world of relativism and uncertainty.
We have far too many people that are comfortable in the pew and take turns
criticizing the pastor or programs that assist in proclaiming the gospel, while
allowing a minority of members to finance the programs and pray for the
As a former pastor, I’ve come to the realization that some sheep have fangs
and are really wolves who will not spare the flock, but seek to tear it apart
and render it ineffective.
Now, let me get back to the main point of my article. It seems that on June
2nd at McClean Bible Church in Virginia, Pastor David Platt had a
guest stop by and request prayer. It was the President. He came in unannounced
and without fanfare and bowed his head on stage as Pastor Platt, while
surprised to see Mr. Trump, did an excellent job in praying not only for him,
but for the welfare of the country as a whole. Afterwards, the President,
saying nothing, quietly left and allowed the service to continue.
This church took Romans 13:1-6 and 1 Timothy 2:1-3 to heart and did what was
presented in the word of God.
Now here is where it gets interesting.
It seems that some of the membership took offense that Mr. Trump actually
had the nerve to set foot inside their church and allow Pastor Platt to pray
for him, then quietly leave. Seriously? You mean to tell me that you worship
your political philosophy more than interceding for the welfare of the leader
of the free world?
There probably would have been no complaints had Mr. Obama come in and bowed
The hard truth is that, ladies and gentlemen of the snowflake mentality, we
have an adult in charge of the welfare of the nation now, crudeness and all. He
is doing his best to put the political inmates back inside the asylum instead of
letting them run rampant like we saw with the last administration,
which, in case you’ve forgotten:
us and used the IRS to harass conservative institutions, and even had the
nerve to audit Billy Graham and his organization,
and had an
office where you could call in and report your neighbor because he
disagreed with Mr. Obama’s policies.
forget that there was a Christmas ornament on the White House tree that
had a picture of Chairman Mao of China, who, for those of you who took
revisionist history, murdered more than 60 million of his citizens plus
caused chaos in the Cultural Revolution from 1966 until his death ten
It was the
last administration that championed socialism and its ilk.
The current generation that wasn’t taught real history does not know about
the hundreds of people who risked their lives escaping from the “worker’s
paradise” of vacation spots like East Berlin and that wall which kept people
divided for nearly thirty years and led to numerous deaths by machine-gun fire
and vicious guard dogs that tore flesh from bodies.
Yeah, Bulgaria and those other nations behind what Winston Churchill called
“the Iron Curtain” were hot spots of independent thought and freedom, weren’t
they? Those of you born before 1990 can remember quite plainly what the world
was like, and how we could have been killed by a nervous trigger finger on the
Idealists like Bernie “Bolshevik” Sanders and the 29-year-old bartender (who
got freaked out with a garbage disposal) named Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez preach
the benefits of “free stuff” without the consequences. These folks who believe
in this secular utopia forget that the government that promises stuff can also
take it away. What Sanders and Cortez won’t tell you is that their way of
thinking resulted in the death of more than 100 million people in the last
century through war, compliance, forced labor, show trials, executions,
persecutions, and overall misery that will not leave once it is established as
Just look at Venezuela as a socialist success story. There is nothing but
misery, oppression, and death, along with corruption and callousness towards
life in general. They were a prosperous nation until someone got it in their
head to listen to a military officer named Hugo Chavez who promised them
greater equality if they would elect him. What the country got were orders to
surrender their firearms, give their possessions to the government on pain of
imprisonment or death, and submit to what has become totalitarianism that will
never go away short of an intervention by another nation.
This is one reason why we should never trust politicians who promise things
but hope you won’t notice that they’re picking your pocket to pay for it.
Thank you, Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, for basically causing misery and
bloodshed and the rise of godlessness disguised as an economic system that
looks good as a philosophy but results in absolute chaos when put into
practice, establishing a tyranny that will eventually collapse, but leaves
behind a trail of carnage that some idealistic historians wish to overlook and
allow the bodies of its victims to rot in the streets. If the government does
such a good job of running things, then why are we in debt to the tune of 21
trillion dollars and nothing seems to work? We’ve made a god out of human
incompetence and trusted it to operate without a moral compass.
As someone who got his start in the real world of honest work, I was a
history and English teacher during the time of the meetings between Ronald
Reagan and Michael Gorbachev. It seems that every intellectual was gushing over
Mr. Gorbachev’s philosophy of “perestroika” that eased some of the oppressive
regulations of Soviet life and allowed some freedom of expression that wouldn’t
throw someone into a gulag for disagreeing with the wishes of the Politburo.
He was willing to reduce the number of missiles aimed at Western Europe if
Mr. Reagan would do one little thing, and was to drop the idea of a Strategic
Defense Initiative (SDI), mockingly called “Star Wars” by our leftist press
(things really haven’t changed in thirty years). SDI was an idea of a
counter-offensive defense system that would intercede and destroy the launch
and direction of a warhead against the U.S. Reagan sold the idea so well that
the Soviets were afraid of it, even though it only existed on paper. It would
soon be revealed that the Soviet bear had teeth, but they were rotten and in
need of pulling.
For those of you who are still enamored with socialism (yes, even some of
you young Christians who believe in social justice), note this. Shortly after
Ronald Reagan (who spoke against socialism) left the Presidency, the whole
socialist system came crashing down in a matter of months and the blight called
the Berlin Wall was torn down, uniting Germany and the establishment of free
Eastern European countries that still prosper today. So much for the “worker’s
If you ever meet a Russian or person from Eastern Europe, ask them about the
“good old days” of oppression and the fear of a knock on the door by the Secret
Police, and then talk about the advantages of socialism; and they will tell you
plainly that you are out of your freaking mind to even consider it.
I have read reports recently that tell of polls and studies saying that
people are getting dumber every year, which is why I believe that a lot of
idealistic young people and some adults are buying into the social justice
movement and attempting to bring it into the life of the church. To me, it is
nothing more than the old Bolshevik promise of “peace, land, and bread,” with a
little Jesus thrown in to make it look holy.
In my Russian history class in college, we read of these promises Lenin gave
to the Russian people after the Czar was overthrown in 1917. What they got were
years of bloody civil war, no right to private property, and no bread in the
stores. They traded freedom for government “social justice” and got nothing in
return except some seventy-four years of death, tyranny, and misery.
The snowflake mentality I see in society today is fodder for the socialists
who promise to take care of them and give them things without the honor and
satisfaction of working for it and realizing that they can do better than they
think they can, and that mediocrity is unacceptable. They seem to wallow in
self-esteem without bothering to care for others or the good of the nation and
a free society. It’s pretty frightening, but I’m really not surprised.
This poison is creeping into churches today that have put aside the claims
of the exclusiveness of the gospel for programs that build up the individual
without challenging them to grow in their faith and get them to take their eyes
off themselves and their self-imposed worldview, focusing instead on the fact
that our brethren across the world are being slaughtered for their faith.
I ask Kenneth Copeland, Jesse Duplantis, and the other prosperity preachers
a favor. Will you fly your $54,000,000 jet to Nigeria and pick up the victims
of Boko Haram, or those believers made homeless by the butchers of ISIS?
Snowflake Christians, I have a favor to ask. Will you quit thinking about
what seemingly offends you, grow up, get a pair, and put what faith in the LORD
you say you have – to work and get people saved from hell, where there will be
no one to care how you feel or whether or not you’re offended by the actions of
your pastor – to be obedient to the LORD and abide by what the Scriptures
Yes, I am getting on your backsides and calling on you to quit focusing on
the world and your little inconveniences, and demonstrate that the faith you
claim to have is not merely empty words.
I am in poor health personally and cannot go to places like I was able to do
only a short time ago. For those of you who have been following me this and last
year, I am getting weaker as the days progress, and I tire easily. I am
starting to feel dull pains where my kidneys are, and I’m content in the
reality that what I am doing each week – to write columns to challenge and
inspire you to be the kind of Christian our LORD expects of you – is what I am
called to do now.
My days of getting behind a pulpit and preaching are past. If I can do any
one thing for the glory of God, it would be to say to you in love that you need
to quit making your ideology the focus of your life and to be committed to the
reality that this world can’t go on much longer.
Your prayers are appreciated for my condition which I gladly bear for the
glory of God.
All the ideas and notions we have for improving life here on this sin-soaked
world will, in the end and according to Scripture, burn up anyway. Eternity is
To the snowflake believers who will get offended by what I have written thus
far, I say in love: I really don’t care what you think of me or what I present.
What I’m doing is to get you to face reality and realize that it does bite at
times. We’re not promised ease in this life – and don’t think for a minute that
it will get better. I don’t have to answer to you, Bernie Sanders, Miss Cortez,
the politicians, the prosperity preachers, or your attitudes on Judgment Day.
Jesus Christ is LORD, not your ideology or feelings.
If you’re not saved, then I implore you to get right with God and repent. I
just want to warn you who feel like you’ve been offended. I say again that
there are no “safe spaces” in hell, and the cries of the damned will drown out
whatever feelings or opinions you have.
Here ends the lesson. Now, make something of yourself and grow up. I know
the LORD will appreciate it.
The Equality Act defies the purpose of anti-discrimination laws. The original Civil Rights Act was enacted to protect African-Americans from being denied access to material goods and services. The Equality Act, by contrast, would be used as a sword to attack people and force them to adopt new ideologies about human sexuality. This extreme and dangerous legislation would create unprecedented harms to businesses, charities, medical professionals, women and children, and entire families. The writing is on the wall: The Equality Act is anything but equal.
The so-called ‘Equality Act’ is nothing more
than a set up for Christians. It is a way for the Left to say “Obey the
law or go to jail.” Very similar to what is happening to Christians all
over the world. But our brethren are being killed. We are not there yet.
American Christians think that we are somehow immune from
persecution. We are not. This Equality Act may not become law now, but it will
one day. We will be placed in jail or re-education camps or worse.
“All these are the beginning of sorrows. Then shall they deliver you up to
be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my
name’s sake. And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and
shall hate one another.” Matthew 24:8-10 (KJV)
One thing I will say about the Left – they are persistent in their
persecution of Christians and Conservatives. Just for the
record, you can’t be a
Christian Liberal. That is an oxymoron.
The Left are frustrated right now. You see, having Donald Trump in the
White House just puts a kink in any and all plans they have in their attempt to
squash their perceived enemies.
These people are unsaved and don’t have the ability to see that they
are being used by the wicked one himself – Satan. We should be praying for our
government officials every day.
This bill prohibits discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation, and
gender identity in areas including public accommodations and facilities,
education, federal funding, employment, housing, credit, and the jury system.
Specifically, the bill defines and includes sex, sexual orientation, and gender
identity among the prohibited categories of discrimination or segregation.
The bill expands the definition of public accommodations to include places
or establishments that provide (1) exhibitions, recreation, exercise,
amusement, gatherings, or displays; (2) goods, services, or programs; and (3)
The bill allows the Department of Justice to intervene in equal protection
actions in federal court on account of sexual orientation or gender identity.
The bill prohibits an individual from being denied access to a shared facility,
including a restroom, a locker room, and a dressing room, that is in accordance
with the individual’s gender identity. source
Most Americans don’t
want a nationwide bathroom requirement, health care mandate, or
“preferred pronoun” law based on gender identity, but congressional Democrats
seem to think it’s time to impose them.
Nancy Pelosi delivered Wednesday on her promise to introduce the so-called
Equality Act, which would elevate sexual orientation and gender identity to
protected classes in federal anti-discrimination law. Although that may sound
nice in theory, in practice sexual orientation and gender identity policies at
the state and local level have caused profound harms to Americans from all
walks of life.
How might a sexual orientation and gender identity law on the federal level,
as introduced in the House and Senate, affect you and your community? Here are
1. It would penalize Americans who don’t affirm new sexual norms or
Jack Phillips’ case went all the way to the Supreme Court
after the Colorado Civil Rights Commission accused the bakery owner of
discriminating on the basis of sexual orientation when the self-described cake
artist declined to create a custom cake to celebrate a same-sex wedding.
The Supreme Court ruled
in favor of Phillips, owner of Masterpiece
Cakeshop, but left the law in question, the Colorado
Anti-Discrimination Act, intact. Until last week, Phillips was in court again
defending himself against the same agency under the same law.
The day after the Supreme Court ruled in Phillips’ case, Autumn Scardina, a
lawyer who identifies as transgender, requested that he create a “gender
transition cake.” After Phillips declined, the state Civil Rights
Commission found probable cause under the law that the baker had discriminated
on the basis of gender identity.
These cases are just the beginning. The same policies used
to silence disagreement over marriage can be used to silence disagreement over
the biological reality of sex.
Just as a side note, yesterday I called one of the largest Muslim owned
bakeries in our area. I asked the woman who answered if they made wedding
cakes. Her answer to me was this “We no longer make wedding
cakes.” I thought to myself that this was wisdom on the
part of the owner of the bakery.
2. It would compel speech.
Virginia high school teacher Peter Vlaming lost
his job for something he did not say. A county school board voted
unanimously to fire the veteran teacher over
the objections of his students after he refused to comply with
administrators’ orders to use masculine pronouns in referring to a female
student who identifies as transgender.
Vlaming did his best to
accommodate the student without violating his religious belief
that God created human beings male and female, using the student’s new name and
simply refraining from using pronouns altogether.
Unfortunately, the school still considered this a violation of its
Incidents like these would increase under federal policy proposed in the
Equality Act. Both federal and private employers could face costly lawsuits if
they fail to implement strict preferred pronoun policies. Employees could be
disciplined if they fail to comply, regardless of their scientific or moral
3. It could shut down charities.
Foster care and adoption agencies, drug rehabilitation
centers, and homeless centers already face challenges under state and local
policies on sexual orientation and gender identity. In Philadelphia, just days
after the city put out an urgent call for 300 additional families to foster
city halted child placements by Catholic Social Services because
of the organization’s belief that every child deserves both a mother and a father.
Although same-sex couples have the opportunity to foster children through
the state or every other agency in Philadelphia, the city canceled its contract
with Catholic Social Services. The agency’s approved foster homes remain
available while children languish on the waiting list.
A federal sexual orientation and gender identity law would make this
situation a national phenomenon, which would spell disaster for the 437,500
children in foster care nationwide. Other charities would be affected, too.
In one attempt, authorities said, Coyle was inebriated and had gotten into a
fight with a staffer at another shelter, so Hope Center staff paid Coyle’s fare
to the emergency room to receive medical attention. Coyle sued the center for
“gender identity discrimination.”
A federal sexual orientation and gender identity law could force any social
service organization to open up private facilities—including single-sex
bathrooms, showers, and sleeping areas—to members of the opposite sex.
4. It would allow more biological males to defeat girls in sports.
Two biological males who identify and compete as women easily
defeated all of their female competitors in an event at the
Connecticut State Track Championships. Transgender athlete Terry Miller broke
the state record in the girls’100-meter dash. Andraya Yearwood, also
transgender, took second place.
Selina Soule, a female runner, not only lost to the biological males in the
championships but also lost out on valuable opportunities to be seen by college
coaches and chosen for scholarships.
Soule said about the 100-meter event: “We all know the outcome of the race
before it even starts; it’s demoralizing.”
A federal sexual orientation and gender identity law would defeat the
purpose of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act, which is supposed to guarantee
women equal educational and athletic opportunities.
Under radical gender identity policies, female athletes have sustained gruesome
injuries at the hands of male competitors. In high school
wrestling, female athletes have forfeited
rather than compete against transgender athletes on testosterone. A federal law
could set girls’ and women’s sports back permanently at every level.
5. It could be used to coerce medical professionals.
Under state sexual orientation and gender identity laws,
individuals who identify as transgender have sued Catholic hospitals in California and New
Jersey for declining to perform hysterectomies on otherwise
healthy women who wanted to pursue gender transition.
If these lawsuits succeed, medical professionals would be pressured to treat
patients according to ideology rather than their best medical judgment.
administration tried to coerce medical professionals into
offering transition-affirming therapies through a regulation in the Affordable
Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare.
Emilie Kao: The Equality Act Would Be the End of Women’s Sports
Emilie Kao discussed the Equality Act and its impact on women’s
sports on The Ingraham Angle on May 28, 2019.
6. It could lead to more parents losing custody of their children.
The politicization of medicine according to gender ideology will create more
conflicts among parents, doctors, and the government. A federal sexual
orientation and gender identity law would jeopardize parental
This has already happened. In Ohio, a judge removed a biological girl from
her parents’ custody after they declined to help her “transition” to male with
After the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital’s Transgender
Health Clinic recommended these treatments for the girl’s gender dysphoria, the
parents wanted to pursue counseling instead. Then the county’s family services
agency charged the parents with abuse and neglect, and the judge terminated
Similar cases are proceeding through the courts with children as
young as 6 years old.
Meanwhile, studies show that 80
to 95 percent of children no longer experience gender dysphoria
after puberty. Politicizing medicine could have serious
consequences for children who are exposed to the unnecessary medical
risks of drastic therapies. A federal sexual orientation and gender identity
law would make these cases more common.
School authorities refused to change the policy even after Thomas reported
the assault. Eventually, she decided to remove her daughter from school for the
girl’s emotional well-being and physical safety.
A federal sexual orientation and gender identity law would give male sexual
predators who self-identify as females access to private facilities, increasing
the likelihood of these tragic incidents. It could also make victims less
likely to report sexual misconduct and police less likely to get
fear of being accused of discrimination.
The proposed Equality Act could impose a nationwide bathroom policy that
would leave women and children in particular vulnerable to predators. It
actually would promote inequality by elevating the ideologies of
special-interest groups to the level of protected groups in civil rights law.
The Equality Act defies the purpose of anti-discrimination
laws. The original Civil Rights Act was enacted to protect African-Americans
from being denied access to material goods and services. The Equality Act, by
contrast, would be used as a sword to attack people and force them
to adopt new ideologies about human sexuality.
This extreme and dangerous legislation would create
unprecedented harms to businesses, charities, medical professionals, women and
children, and entire families. The writing is on the wall: The Equality Act is
anything but equal
Missouri’s Republican-led Senate has passed a wide-ranging bill to ban
abortions at eight weeks of pregnancy, acting only hours after Alabama’s
governor signed a near-total abortion ban into law. The Missouri
bill needs another vote of approval in the GOP-led House before it can go to
Republican Gov. Mike Parson, who voiced support for an earlier version
It includes exceptions for medical emergencies, but not for pregnancies
caused by rape or incest. Doctors would face five to 15 years in prison for
violating the eight-week cutoff. Women who receive abortions wouldn’t be
Republican Senate handler Sen. Andrew Koenig described it on Thursday as
“one of the strongest” abortion bills yet passed in the U.S.
As CBS News’ Kate Smith has reported,
Missouri already has some of the most restrictive abortion access laws in the
country. Missourians seeking an abortion are subject to a 72-hour waiting
period and only one abortion clinic exist in the state.
Missouri joins a movement of GOP-dominated state legislatures emboldened by
the possibility that a more conservative Supreme Court could overturn its landmark
ruling legalizing the procedure. Its senators voted only hours after
Alabama’s governor signed the most stringent abortion ban in the nation on
Wednesday, making performing an abortion a felony in nearly all cases.
Outnumbered Missouri Senate Democrats launched into an attack on the bill
before Republican supporters had a chance to bring it up for debate on the
“So much of this bill is just shaming women into some kind of
complacency that says we are vessels of pregnancy rather than understanding
that women’s lives all hold different stories,” St. Louis-area Democratic
Sen. Jill Schupp said.
Missouri is among a growing number of states where abortion opponents are
working with renewed enthusiasm following President Donald Trump’s appointment
of more conservative high court justices. Kentucky, Mississippi, Ohio and
Georgia have approved bans on abortion once fetal cardiac activity can be
detected, which can occur in about the sixth week of pregnancy. Similar
restrictions in North Dakota and Iowa have been struck down in court.
Supporters say the Alabama bill is intentionally designed to conflict with
the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationally in hopes of
sparking a court case that might prompt the justices to revisit abortion
Missouri’s bill also includes an outright ban on abortions except in cases
of medical emergencies. But unlike Alabama’s, it would kick in only if Roe v.
Wade is overturned.
If courts don’t allow Missouri’s proposed eight-week ban to take effect, it
includes a ladder of less-restrictive time limits ranging from 14 to 20 weeks.
Roe v. Wade legalized abortion up until viability, which is usually at 22 to 24
“This is not a piece of legislation that is designed for a
challenge,” Missouri’s Republican House Speaker Elijah Haahr said. “This
is the type of legislation that is designed to withstand a challenge and to
actually save lives in our state.”
Republicans and Democrats worked for hours to reach a compromise on the
bill, which included an expansion of tax credits for donations to pregnancy
resource centers, and waters down other provisions.
The approved version of the wide-ranging bill bans abortions based solely on
race, sex or a “prenatal diagnosis, test, or screening indicating Down
Syndrome or the potential of Down Syndrome.” It also requires that both
parents be notified for a minor to get an abortion, but a change was made after
hours of late-night negotiations to remove the requirement when a parent lacks
legal or physical custody. Current law requires written consent from only one
Still, some lawmakers on both sides of the debate walked away unhappy.
Democrat Schrupp said even after changes, it’s “an extreme and
egregious piece of legislation that puts women’s health at risk.”
“It is outrageous that it has no exemptions for victims of human
trafficking, rape or incest,” she said.
Republican Sen. Bob Onder said negotiators went too far to compromise,
leaving the bill “a shadow of what it once was.”
“This should be entitled not the ‘Missouri Stands for the Unborn
Act,'” Onder told colleagues on the Senate floor, “but the ‘Missouri
Stands for the Unborn Act, sort of kind of only after the minority party and
the strongest Planned Parenthood lawyers in the country were done with the
The Vatican has sent a special message to all the world’s Muslims, wishing them “a peaceful and fruitful celebration of Ramadan.” “We Muslims and Christians are called to open ourselves to others, knowing and recognizing them as brothers and sisters,” the text states. “In this way, we can tear down walls raised out of fear and ignorance and seek together to build bridges of friendship that are fundamental for the good of all humanity.”
The endearing use of the phrase “brothers
and sisters” invokes a vision of harmony and peace together. This is not
the case between Muslims and Christians globally. This is Chrislam.
If I call someone who is not my biological
sibling my ‘brother or sister’ what exactly am I saying? Well, with the use of
that term, I am acknowledging that that person and myself share an overwhelming
and fundamental agreement about the major issues in life. The bible tells us
that two people cannot ‘walk together’ through life unless there be in
agreement with each other, as we see in the bible verse below. And when
we read the entire chapter from which that verse is taken, we see that verse is
used as a rebuke, which is exactly how I am using it here.
“Can two walk together, except they be agreed?”
Amos 3:3 (KJV)
Pope Francis continues his full court press of
wooing the Muslims and Islam into the folds of the Roman Catholic tent as he
One World Religion that Revelation 13, 17 and 18 tells us the
Roman pontiff will do. As we have long said, just as Rome used the armies of
Spain to enforce the demonic Spanish Inquisition for nearly 300 years, so will
Rome now seek to use the armies of Islamic jihad to promote the Roman Catholic
harlot at the point of a sword. You may not know much bible, you may not
believe in bible prophecy, but that doesn’t change the fact that you are
watching it come to life before your very eyes. The pope is effectively using false
teachers like Rick Warren to advance his cause.
Pope Francis is not merely a ‘defender of
Islam’, he is a promoter of Islam and by extension Sharia Law. He has been
working on this partnership and it soon will be completed, when it is, look
out. Rome will once again have an army, and at that point they will quit
pretending to be a lamb, and go right back to being the ‘roaring lion’ who only
comes to seek, kill and destroy. Pope Francis and his Roman religion is creating
Chrislam, the merger of counterfeit Christianity and Islam, and
he is doing it with impunity. He knows that ‘now is his hour’ and that the
‘power of darkness’ will continue to propel him forward. That’s how he can look
on Muslims who practice Sharia Law and preach hatred of the Jews and Israel as
‘brothers and sisters’ because he is one of them.
Vatican issues a happy Ramadan to all “Muslim brothers and sisters”
FROM JIHAD WATCH: Too many Christians live under
the worst conditions in Islamic countries, as they endure violent persecution
daily under the Sharia. The Pope of Islam is
living a lie and promoting the same. Ongoing, he has abandoned persecuted
Christians, and also persecuted other minority groups including minority Muslim
groups and other victims of jihad. He has also turned a blind eye to Islamic
supremacist assaults and jihad attacks in Western countries as a result of open
His pursuit of dialogue has never included the
demand that Islamic leaders and adherents accept religious freedoms, and the
equality of other faiths and human beings regardless of gender and personal
identity. The Pope does not promote a two way street in his so-called
advancement of “dialogue”. His expectation is that Christians must
embrace “dialogue”, “diversity” and “tolerance” of everyone—including
jihadists– but he has no such message and expectation of Muslims.
The Pope has also declared Rome to be a “city
of bridges, never walls!,” and further stated that “Jesus
demands” we take in Muslim migrants. Meanwhile, he lives in a walled city
within Rome, surrounded by security, and he is not taking in any migrants
Robert Sarah — prefect of the Congregation for Divine
Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments — compared “the modern influx of
Muslim migrants to the invasions of barbarian tribes that ultimately brought
down the Roman Empire in a.d. 475.” Sarah also warned that “it is a false
exegesis [interpretation of scriptural text] to use the Word of God to promote
migration. God never wanted these rifts.”
For the Pope’s trip to Morocco, Vatican media
promotions abandoned the traditional papal insignia and replaced it with the
cross and the crescent; and the crescent did not appear “alongside the cross,
as if a companion to it. Rather, the Islamic symbol encircles the Christian
one” symbolizing a kind of submission
Islamic law, Muslim lives are explicitly worth more than those
of non-Muslims. The Shafi’i Sharia manual Reliance of the Traveller dictates:
“The indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity
paid for a man. The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is one-third the
indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid for a Zoroastrian is
one-fifteenth that of a Muslim.” (o4.9) Sikhs rank even lower, as they are not
People of the Book. The Pope addresses none of this.
Pope Francis has accurately been hailed the “defender of Islam”. As
Robert Spencer rightly notes:
Pope Francis is not only disastrously wrongheaded about an obvious fact that
is reinforced by every day’s headlines; he is also deceiving and misleading his
people about a matter of utmost importance, and keeping them ignorant and
complacent about a growing and advancing threat. source
“Vatican Pope Francis Wishes Happy Ramadan to ‘Muslim Brothers and Sisters’
The Vatican has sent
a special message to all the world’s Muslims, wishing them “a
peaceful and fruitful celebration of Ramadan.” The month of Ramadan, which
began this year on May 5, is “a month for strengthening the spiritual bonds we
share in Muslim-Christian friendship,” reads the message from the
Vatican’s office of interreligious dialogue bearing the title “Christians and
Muslims: Promoting Universal Fraternity.”
“We Muslims and Christians are called to open ourselves to others, knowing
and recognizing them as brothers and sisters,” the text states. “In this way,
we can tear down walls raised out of fear and ignorance and seek together to
build bridges of friendship that are fundamental for the good of all humanity.”
“We thus cultivate in our families and in our political, civil and religious
institutions, a new way of life where violence is rejected, and the human
person respected,” reads the message, which bears the signature of Bishop
Miguel Ángel Ayuso Guixot, secretary of the Pontifical
Council for Interreligious Dialogue.
Our religions invite us to “remain rooted in the
values of peace; to defend the values of mutual understanding, human fraternity
and harmonious coexistence; to re-establish wisdom, justice and love,” the text
says, citing a
joint declaration signed by Pope Francis and the Grand Imam Ahmed a-Tayyeb in
Abu Dhabi this past February.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH: THE END TIMES
‘UNIVERSAL PEACE DOCUMENT’ POPE FRANCIS SIGNED WITH ISLAMIC LEADER MAKES NO
REFERENCE OF ANY KIND TO JESUS CHRIST OR THE BIBLE
That same declaration brought down heavy
criticism on the pope particularly due to the assertion that the plurality and
diversity of religions “are willed by God in His wisdom,” just as God wills a
plurality of colors, sexes, races, and languages.
A number of Catholic theologians raised objections to the statement, insisting
that it seemed to suggest that either God actively wills error, or that all
religions are equally valid paths to God. The existence of a variety of colors,
races, and languages in humanity is very different from a variety of
contradictory claims about God’s identity and way of acting, they said.
In early April, Francis walked back the earlier statement,
clarifying that in reality God only permits the existence of many
religions without actively willing it. The Vatican’s Ramadan message steers
clear of such theological swampland.
“We are encouraged, therefore, to continue advancing the culture of dialogue
as a means of cooperation and as a method of growing in knowledge of one
another,” the message says.
Iran’s intelligence minister has admitted publicly for the first time that
Christianity is spreading throughout Iran.
Mahmoud Alavi, the Islamic Republic’s intelligence minister, was giving a
speech in front of several Shia Muslim clerics when he announced
“Christianity is spreading in “parts” of Iran.”
In an apparent attempt to make light of the people are converting, Alavi
said: “These converts are ordinary people whose jobs are selling
sandwiches or similar things.”
The intelligence minister also told the clerics to quit bickering among
“We had no choice but to summon them to ask them why they were
converting,” said Alavi told the assembled group. “Some of them said
they were looking for a religion that gives them peace. We told them that Islam
is the religion of brotherhood and peace. They responded by saying that: ‘All
the time we see Muslim clerics and those who preach from the pulpit talk
against each other. If Islam is the religion of cordiality, then before
anything else, there must be cordiality and peace among the clerics
“It is not the job of the intelligence community to find the roots of
these conversions from Islam. But it’s happening right before our eyes,”
Iran is known for its mounting persecution of Christians. The Islamic
Republic is listed as number 9 among the world’s top persecutors of Christians,
according to Open Doors USA. Christians in Iran are forbidden
from sharing their faith with non-Christians. Consequently, church services in
Persian (Iran’s national language) are not allowed.
The 20-page document is a follow-up to the 2017 Filial Correction of Pope Francis that was signed originally by 62 scholars and which stated that the Pope has “effectively upheld 7 heretical positions about marriage, the moral life, and the reception of the sacraments, and has caused these heretical opinions to spread in the Catholic Church,” especially in light of his 2016 exhortation Amoris Laetitia. The authors of the open letter state in a summary of their letter that it has now become clear that Pope Francis is aware of his own positions contrary to the faith and that the time has come to go a “stage further” by claiming that Pope Francis is “guilty of the crime of heresy.”
Prominent Catholic clergymen and scholars
including Fr. Aidan Nichols, one of the best-known theologians in the
English-speaking world, have issued an open letter accusing Pope Francis of
The Roman Catholic Church is not the Church that Jesus
started, but to unsaved lost people it kind of looks and sounds like it. Kind
of. Well, maybe a little? OK, not at all, but you get what I mean. The Roman
counterfeit fools a lot of people because of its outer veneer of religiosity.
But even within those parameters, the papacy of Pope
Francis is making a lot of high-level Catholics pretty mad. Why?
Let’s take a look and see.
“And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come
out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye
receive not of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath
remembered her iniquities. Reward her even as she rewarded you, and double unto
her double according to her works: in the cup which she hath filled fill to her
double.” Revelation 18:4-6 (KJV)
But I have a news flash for this band of 31 Catholic
theologians that might surprise them, and why they might want to retract their
demands that Pope Francis stop all his religious shenanigans. Francis is only doing
what the bible says the last pope in the end times is supposed to do. The bible
says that there will be a One World Religion
in Revelation 13, and Pope Francis is taking steps to make that happen. The
bible says in Revelation 13, 17 and 18, that there will be a One World
Government over which the king of Vatican City will rule the
world, albeit for a short time, and Pope Francis is working to bring that to
pass as well.
So if these ‘high-ranking’ theologians knew anything about
the bible, what they would be doing is
getting saved, leaving the Roman Catholic counterfeit, and prepare to leave
this world in the Pretribulation
Rapture of the Church. Flight #777 on Titus213 Airlines is now
boarding.! Ahh…you look at life just a little differently when you’re a bible
believer. I’ll take that over being a ‘high-ranking theologian’ any day.
Prominent clergy, scholars accuse Pope Francis of heresy in open letter
FROM LIFE SITE NEWS: They ask the bishops of the Catholic
Church, to whom the open letter is addressed, to “take the steps necessary to
deal with the grave situation” of a pope committing this crime. The authors
base their charge of heresy on the manifold manifestations of Pope Francis’
embrace of positions contrary to the faith and his dubious support of prelates
who in their lives have shown themselves to have a clear disrespect for the
Church’s faith and morals.
“We take this measure as a last resort to respond to the accumulating harm
caused by Pope Francis’s words and actions over several years, which have given
rise to one of the worst crises in the history of the Catholic Church,” the
authors state. The open letter is available in Dutch, Italian, German, French,
Among the signatories are well-respected scholars such as
Father Thomas Crean, Fr. John Hunwicke, Professor John Rist, Dr. Anna Silvas,
Professor Claudio Pierantoni, Dr. Peter Kwasniewski, and Dr. John
Lamont. The text is dated “Easter Week” and appears on the traditional
Feast Day of St. Catherine of Siena, a saint who counseled and admonished
several popes in her time.
The 20-page document is
a follow-up to the 2017 Filial Correction of
Pope Francis that was signed originally by 62 scholars and which stated that
the Pope has “effectively upheld 7 heretical positions about marriage, the
moral life, and the reception of the sacraments, and has caused these heretical
opinions to spread in the Catholic Church,” especially in light of his 2016
exhortation Amoris Laetitia.
The authors of the open letter state in a summary
of their letter (read below) that it has now become clear that
Pope Francis is aware of his own positions contrary to the faith and that
the time has come to go a “stage further” by claiming that Pope Francis is
“guilty of the crime of heresy.”
“We limit ourselves to accusing him of heresy on occasions where he has
publicly denied truths of the faith, and then consistently acted in a way that
demonstrates that he disbelieves these truths that he has publicly denied,” the
They clarify that they are not claiming Pope Francis has “denied truths of
the faith in pronouncements that satisfy the conditions for an infallible papal
“We assert that this would be impossible, since it would be incompatible
with the guidance given to the Church by the Holy Spirit,” they state. In light
of this situation, the authors call upon the bishops of the Church to take
action since a “heretical papacy may not be tolerated or dissimulated to avoid
a worse evil.”
For this reason, the authors “respectfully request the
bishops of the Church to investigate the accusations contained in the letter,
so that if they judge them to be well founded they may free the Church from her
present distress, in accordance with the hallowed adage, Salus
animarum prima lex (‘the salvation of souls is the highest
law’). The bishops can do this, the writers suggest, “by admonishing Pope
Francis to reject these heresies, and if he should persistently refuse, by
declaring that he has freely deprived himself of the papacy.”
The authors first present in detail – and with theological references to
substantiate their claims – the different positions against the faith Pope
Francis has shown himself to hold, propagate, or support, including “seven
propositions contradicting divinely revealed truth.”
One of the heresies the authors accuse Pope Francis of
committing is expressed in the following proposition: “A Christian believer can
have full knowledge of a divine law and voluntarily choose to break it in a
serious matter, but not be in a state of mortal sin as a result of this
action.” Many of these heretical statements touch on questions of marriage and
the family and are to be found in Amoris Laetitia,
but there is also a new claim made by Pope Francis in 2019 – namely, that the
“diversity of religions” is “willed by God” – that is listed in the open
In one section of the open letter, the authors list the
many prelates as well as lay people, who, despite openly dissenting from
Catholic doctrine and morals — either by word or by deed — have been by Pope
Francis either publicly praised (such as Emma Bonino) or raised to influential
positions (such as Cardinal Oscar Rodrigez Maradiaga). On this list are names
such as Cardinal Blase Cupich, Cardinal Godfried Danneels, Cardinal Donald
Wuerl, Bishop Gustavo Zanchetta, and Bishop Juan Barros.
The fact that Pope Francis never responded to the dubia (questions)
concerning Amoris Laetitia published
by Cardinals Carlo Caffarra, Joachim Meisner, Walter Brandmüller, and Raymond
Burke is mentioned. Moreover, the authors point out that Pope Francis has
changed the members of the Pontifical Academy for Life to such an extent that
orthodox Catholic experts have been replaced by heterodox experts, such as
Father Maurizio Chiodi.
Addressing the bishops of the world – among whom are to be
found all the present 222 cardinals – the authors of the open letter express
their gratitude toward those bishops who have defended Catholic doctrine by
their own personal witnesses.
“We recognise with gratitude that some among you have reaffirmed the truths
contrary to the heresies which we have listed, or else have warned of serious
dangers threatening the Church in this pontificate,” they state. Here, the
dubia cardinals, but also Cardinal Willem Eijk, are mentioned. The authors also
thank Cardinal Gerhard Müller for his Manifesto
The authors believe, however, that at this time in history,
six years into the Francis pontificate, more is needed, namely a more direct
and authoritative approach. They recognize their own limits when they tell the
bishops: “Despite the evidence that we have put forward in this letter, we
recognise that it does not belong to us to declare the pope guilty of the
delict of heresy in a way that would have canonical consequences for
“We therefore appeal to you as our spiritual fathers, vicars of Christ
within your own jurisdictions and not vicars of the Roman pontiff, publicly to
admonish Pope Francis to abjure the heresies that he has professed. Even
prescinding from the question of his personal adherence to these heretical
beliefs, the Pope’s behaviour in regard to the seven propositions contradicting
divinely revealed truth, mentioned at the beginning of this Letter, justifies
the accusation of the delict of heresy. It is beyond a doubt that he promotes
and spreads heretical views on these points. Promoting and spreading heresy
provides sufficient grounds in itself for an accusation of the delict of
heresy. There is, therefore, superabundant reason for the bishops to take the
accusation of heresy seriously and to try to remedy the situation,” they state.
The authors make it clear that it is up to the bishops to take action and
that they do not need a majority among the bishops to do so.
“Since Pope Francis has manifested heresy by his actions as well as by his
words, any abjuration must involve repudiating and reversing these actions,
including his nomination of bishops and cardinals who have supported these
heresies by their words or actions. Such an admonition is a duty of fraternal charity
to the Pope, as well as a duty to the Church,” they state.
“If – which God forbid! – Pope Francis does not bear the fruit of true
repentance in response to these admonitions, we request that you carry out your
duty of office to declare that he has committed the canonical delict of heresy
and that he must suffer the canonical consequences of this crime,” they add.
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH: THE END TIMES ‘UNIVERSAL
PEACE DOCUMENT’ POPE FRANCIS SIGNED WITH ISLAMIC LEADER MAKES NO REFERENCE OF
ANY KIND TO JESUS CHRIST OR THE BIBLE
Thus, the authors state, “these actions do not need to be
taken by all the bishops of the Catholic Church, or even by a majority of them.
A substantial and representative part of the faithful bishops of the Church
would have the power to take these actions.”
The full 20-page document may be read here.
A select bibliography to support the case made in the open letter to the
bishops of the Catholic Church about Pope Francis’ heresies may be
A petition launched by the organizers of the open letter to support their
initiative can be found here.
Revelation 1:3 "Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear, and who keep what is written in it, for the time is near".
Watchman for Christ