Michael Foust | ChristianHeadlines.com Contributor | Tuesday, December 10, 2019
Cambodians Hear the Gospel, More than 1,300 Give Their Lives to Christ at
Franklin Graham Festival
More than 23,000 heard the Gospel and 1,396 made the decision to give
their live to Christ during a two-day Franklin Graham Festival over the weekend
in Cambodia, a nation that is 98 percent Buddhist.
“Did you know that you have a
soul?” Graham asked the crowd. “One day you will die,
but your soul continues to live. Your soul will live in the presence of God, or
it will be separated from God. The decision you make tonight will decide where
your soul will spend eternity.”
The “Love Phnom Penh Festival with
Franklin Graham” was held Dec. 7-8 in the same country where Christianity was
nearly eliminated during the Khmer Rouge – a genocide in the 1970s that sought
to eliminate religion and develop a “master race” under the leadership of
Pol Pot. It was the focus of the film The Killing Fields. An estimated
2 million people died, and only about 200 Christians survived the atrocities,
according to a press release. Missionaries fled during the genocide.
Local Christian leaders say the
Festival had a major impact. It was the largest Christian outreach ever in the
country, with 23,700 attending, Christian Newswire reports.
Spirit has touched our city and entire land. We are thankful that people
heard the Gospel that Jesus is the Truth, Way and Life,” said Sin Somnang,
pastor of Fellowship Church of Pochentong and the Festival’s general chairman.
“This will be a blessing for our country and our spiritual legacy to be
remembered for the next generation through the Festival.”
Among those who made a decision for Christ was 59-year-old Chhimreth. She
had heard of Jesus before, but had not made Him Lord of her life.
“I feel very happy and joyful,” Chhimreth said through a translator.
Local churches will follow up with those who made decisions.
“We pray this [Festival] will open the door for more of the Lord’s work in
the future,” Graham said.
The Society of Jesuits has been the object of considerable suspicion from more traditional religious orders and from sections of the Catholic laity. Pope Paul IV, who served from 1555 to 1559, described the Society’s internal structure as a tyranny, and in a difficult and bad-tempered exchange with the second superior general of the Jesuits, he alleged that if they did not begin the choral recitation of the office, one day “Satan would arise from their ranks.”
Speculation has arisen lately about the
status of the Society of Jesus, now that the highest office in the Church is
held by a member of the Jesuits.
One reason why Pope Francis is such an excellent candidate
for either the False Prophet or the Antichrist is because he
is a Jesuit, and the Jesuits are the George Soros of the Roman
Catholic Church. They are a secret society that has been the brains behind more
mayhem than you could shake a stick at. In fact, they once hatched a plot to
assassinate King James of England in order to try and stop the King James Bible
from being produced, but happily they were unsuccessful. Guy
Fawkes Day commemorates that occasion every year.
“For true and righteous are his
judgments: for he hath judged the great whore, which did corrupt the earth with
her fornication, and hath avenged the blood of his servants at her hand. And
again they said, Alleluia. And her smoke rose up for ever and ever.” Revelation
In 1540, Pope Paul III officially accepted “The Society of
Jesus” (Jesuits) into
the Roman Catholic system. Today, the Jesuit General, is respected and feared
by every Jesuit as God Himself. It is neither a secret nor a conspiracy theory
that the Jesuit Pope Francis has not only been remaking the Roman
Catholic Church, but creating the One World
Religion as well. A Jesuit takeover of the Vatican led by Pope
Francis? It could absolutely be happening, and most likely is.
A Jesuit coup? Speculation rises of a Vatican takeover by the Pope’s own
FROM LIFE SITE NEWS: Historically, the Society of Jesuits
has been the object of considerable suspicion from more traditional religious
orders and from sections of the Catholic laity. Pope Paul IV, who served from
1555 to 1559, described the Society’s internal structure as a tyranny, and in a
difficult and bad-tempered exchange with the second superior general of the
Jesuits, he alleged that if they did not begin the choral recitation of the
office, one day “Satan would arise from their ranks.”
Famously, one of the greatest theological disputes in the
history of the Church, the de Auxiliis controversy,
was left unresolved because of Pope Paul V’s fear that condemning the Jesuit
theology of grace as heretical (as the older theological schools insisted that
it was) would do irreparable harm to the society’s prestige, damaging the
CLICK TO READ ALL ABOUT THE SECRET HISTORY OF
The celebrated French author and mathematician, Blaise
Pascal, reproached the
society for having compromised the Augustinian doctrine of God’s grace and led
their penitents into moral laxity. Through the first two hundred
years of its history, the society was adorned with many saints whose missionary
labors were prodigious and who gave their lives for the Gospel and for the
unity of the Church. Undoubtedly, the Jesuits struck fear into the hearts of
Protestants and secular enemies of the Church.
In 1773, under huge pressure from so-called “Enlightened”
despots then ruling Catholic Europe, Pope Clement XIV (a Franciscan) “forever
annulled and extinguished” the Society of Jesus. In the period following their
dissolution, certain theological positions dear to the Jesuits but less
congenial to the more traditional schools sank beneath the waves, and in the
words of Francis Sullivan, SJ, “hardly any Catholic theologians dared to
question the traditional teaching.”
And yet, in 1814, in the wake of Napoleon’s defeat and
abdication, Pius VII revived the Society, its dissolution being associated with
the secularism that climaxed in the French Revolution.
“The public is practically unaware of the overwhelming responsibility
carried by the Vatican and its Jesuits in the start of the two world wars — a
situation which may be explained in part by the gigantic finances at the disposition
of the Vatican and its Jesuits, giving them power in so many spheres,
especially since the last conflict.” Edmond Paris
While the scale of the hostility among Catholics that
existed before the dissolution did not revive, there remained a strong resistance
to the appointment of Jesuits to senior positions in the Roman Curia, and to
the election of a Jesuit as pope. The Jesuits in fact promise to spurn high
ecclesial office unless compelled to accept it under obedience.
But in these days, concerns have been raised that, the ultimate glass
ceiling having been broken, with a Jesuit upon the throne of St. Peter, all the
lesser bastions are also giving way, or rather being given away.
In the wake of the Second Vatican Council, the Jesuits have
become stalwarts of the new liberal conception of Catholicism and the hostility
of former centuries among more conservative and traditional clergy, laity and
religious has revived. Like the medieval tale of Prester John, the
legend of the good Jesuit endures in the hearts of the faithful. Over the next
hill and around the next bend he must exist, prostrated
somewhere in a cave doing penance for the latest article of James
Martin, with copious tears.
Journalist Joshua McElwee, Vatican correspondent for the National
Catholic Reporter (NCR), has observed an
increasing flow of Jesuits into prominent positions in the Roman Curia under
Pope Francis. The Society’s formidable reputation has in the past created a
general reluctance to concede to them the commanding heights of the papal
administration. But now, McElwee alleges, that age is past. McElwee
argues that a number of significant appointments under Francis, including the
recent pick of Spanish Jesuit Father Antonio Guerrero Alves as prefect of the
Secretariat for the Economy, a post held until recently by Cardinal George
Pell, have raised Jesuits to positions never before held in the Roman Curia.
Until now, Fr. Guerrero has served as Councilor to the
Society’s Superior General, Fr. Arturo Sosa, and has overseen Jesuit houses in
Rome, including the Gregorian, the Biblicum and the Pontifical Oriental
Institute. In an interview with Vatican News following Guerrero’s appointment,
Fr. Sosa said he asked the Pope that the appointment “not be associated with
the episcopate,” so that Fr. Guerrero, 60, could “return, after finishing his
mission, to his normal life as a Jesuit.”
According to McElwee’s reckoning, the only Jesuit ever
previously to have held the rank of prefect in Rome was the late German
Cardinal Augustin Bea, who “headed the Secretariat for Promoting Christian
Unity under Popes John XXIII and Paul VI from 1960-68.” One NCR source called
Pope Francis’s choices “an anomaly and certainly not traditional,” while
another argued that it is only natural for a pope to appoint “like-minded” men
who “fit the model.”
On this episode of Rightly Dividing, we will explore the many prophecies in the King James Bible related to the end times falling away of the Christian Church. The Falling Away is not so much a falling into something, but a falling away from something that is very critical to the Body of Christ, and that is Bible doctrine. Charles Spurgeon once remarked that the “time will come when instead of pastors feeding the sheep, we will have clowns entertaining the goats”. I believe we have gathered enough evidence to prove that to now be the case.
Charles Spurgeon once remarked that the “time will
come when instead of pastors feeding the sheep, we will have clowns
entertaining the goats”. I believe we have gathered enough evidence to prove
that to now be the case.
Last week, we warned you about the very real possibility of an end times false revival breaking
out within the Christian Church, one fueled in part by the intense popularity
of Kanye West and his ‘Jesus Is King‘ album. Tonight we
will show you proof that it is also highly likely that the great ‘falling away’
prophesied by both Jesus and the apostle Paul has already begun and indeed is
“Now we beseech you,
brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our
gathering together unto him, That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be
troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us, as that the
day of Christ is at hand. Let no man deceive you by any means: for that
day shall not come, except there come a falling away first,
and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and
exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that
he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.”2 Thessalonians
On this episode of Rightly Dividing, we will explore the many prophecies in
the King James Bible related to the end times falling away of the Christian
Church. The Falling Away is not so much a falling into something, but a falling
away from something that is very critical to the Body of Christ, and that is Bible doctrine. Charles
Spurgeon once remarked that the “time will come when instead of pastors feeding
the sheep, we will have clowns entertaining the goats”. I believe we have
gathered enough evidence to prove that to now be the case.
Groups like the LGBTQ+P for Pedophile Movement, Planned Parenthood, transgender activists, Drag Queen Story Hour and
countless others have not only risen to power over the last few years, they are
on the verge of seizing power. You may truly not be aware of how bad things
really are, but after listening to this very important Bible study, you will
not longer have the excuse of ignorance. I guarantee this particular will be an
eye-opener, and it may even make you mad. But I would rather have you mad and
awake, than happy, pacified and docile the way most of you are right now.
My friend Dan told me recently he was thinking of leaving his church because they’d spent nine consecutive sermons on the Enneagram. Since then the same topic has popped up in at least four different places. I’ve done some research, and I’m alarmed at what I’m discovering.
The Enneagram is a personality test, much in the same vein as the Myers/Briggs Type Inventory, or the DiSC test. It claims to do more than they do, though. I’d heard of it long ago, and I did enough work on it then to have serious doubts about it on technical grounds. Research on its validity — essentially, whether it reliably measures what it claims to measure — was unimpressive, to say the least. My friend Jay Medenwalt has details on that.
That in itself ought to be of concern to Christians using it. “Validity” is psychometric tech-speak. Functionally, you could say another word for it is simply “truth.” An invalid instrument is one whose purported results aren’t quite telling the truth, in one way or another. That’s not to suggest the test’s creators were practicing deceit, only that the test results can’t be entirely trusted. Still it matters.
Yet Christians use it. My friend’s church is a fine one by every measure I’ve known. I’ve never attended it, but my son met his wife there. The mission group Cru, with which I served for 34 years, has taught “Going Deeper with the Enneagram.” One Cru staff seminar called it “awesome.” InterVarsity has apparently used it, too. Maybe they’re not so much in tune with psychometrics.
And honestly, I’m not a total stickler for validity myself, as long as tests like these are used appropriately. The popular DiSC test also lacks strict validation last time I checked. Still, I’ve found it useful as a conversation starter. I’ve used it to get team members talking with each other about their strengths, weaknesses, and relational styles. I put emphasis on starter there, though. I don’t encourage them to dwell too long on their test scores as if they told the complete and lasting truth about themselves.
The Enneagram’s Occult Origins
My friend Dan was up to speed on these matters. He had all of it in mind when he told me about the Enneagram being taught at his church. But then he dropped a bombshell: the Enneagram was birthed out of an occult vision.
I looked into that, checking Marcia Montenegro’s website for my main source of information. (More than one knowledgeable friend has informed me she’s the go-to Christian thinker on this.) Turns out the occult-origin story is controversial, but the information I read makes it seem more than likely it’s true.
A simple investigation into the Enneagram reveals that its theories of personality are based on esoteric teachings and an occult worldview. The clear origin and purpose of the Enneagram is to initiate a Gnostic spiritual awakening to one’s alleged true divine Self, which is in itself an occult initiation. This is the claim and goal of virtually all occult and New Age teachings.
Montenegro calls it the GPS: “Gnostic Path to Self.” Gnosticism was a secret-knowledge heresy that plagued Christianity in its first few centuries. It still lives on in various cults and occult groups today.
Further Research on Origins and Effect
And yet I still had to ask whether this concern might be overblown. The New Testament’s teaching on “food offered to idols” (Romans 14:14-23 and 1 Cor. 10:23-32) tells us it’s not an item’s origin but its content that matters. What also matters is the confusion it might create for onlookers. But setting that aside, the more I looked into it, the more the content itself appeared problematic.
Even if it seems “eerily accurate,” as some people have said, it’s not worth staking any decisions on it.
Amazon only appears to offer one book on it written especially for Christians, which is not self-published: The Sacred Enneagram: Finding Your Unique Path to Spiritual Growth by Christopher L. Heuertz, with a foreword by Richard Rohr, published by Zondervan. Richard Rohr calls himself Christian, but he teaches an unorthodox universalist/evolutionary mysticism instead. That sets the book off to a bad start.
The “Sacred” Enneagram?
In a book trailer, author Heuertz describes the book in terms that continue to raise issues. He says the Enneagram “found me” and gave him “clarity” on “what it looks like to find our way home.” This is giving a human-created instrument of dubious origins way too much spiritual credence.
There’s more. It’s about “excavating essence,” for “self-liberation,” he says. It does what we can’t do for ourselves, which is to “self-observe.” It’s even “sacred,” he says, because it “moves beyond personality quirks … tethering us to our eccentricities and our foibles.” It’s about “nine inward journeys, nine inward paths back home to God.” It can help us “find our way back to the source of love that authentically defines us for who we are.”
That just about tipped it over the top for me. All this God intends to do for us through His Word, through prayer, through service, and through authentic, transparent Christian community. Not through an invalid self-report questionnaire, and not through one of “nine paths to God”! And especially not one with occult origins.
Still, I wanted to look at the book itself. On page 50, Heuertz seeks to answer Christian concerns about the Enneagram. The attempt is not, shall I say, very heartening:
Its role in bringing about a transformed life bears out its holy validity. And thanks in large part to the great work done by Father Richard [Rohr] and others to bring a Christian perspective to this ancient tool, evangelical seminaries and churches everywhere are incorporating the Enneagram into their curriculum.
I have serious trouble seeing how Rohr has influenced evangelicals with “a Christian perspective.” This is undiscerning at best. (I’ll leave it at that, to be as charitable as possible.)
That answered my final question. I have to agree with my friend Dan, with Marcia Montenegro, and others who’ve raised serious concerns about the Enneagram. It doesn’t have psychometric validity, it has occult origins, and it doesn’t fall in the potentially innocent “meat offered to idols” category. Its main proponents in the Christian realm appear to be using it for purposes God clearly intended to be fulfilled in other ways.
So I’ve decided I’ll never use it, and I strongly advise others not to use it, either. If you’ve used the Enneagram, even if you come to different conclusions about its spiritual origins and impact, you should at least know that your “number” comes out of poorly developed testing practices. Even if it seems “eerily accurate,” as some people have said, it’s not worth staking decisions on it.
ROME — Pope Francis has publicly endorsed an essay that appeared in 2017 criticizing relations between Evangelicals and Catholics in the United States as an “ecumenism of hate.”
On Thursday, La Civiltà Cattolica journal released the transcript of a meeting between Pope Francis and a
group of 24 Jesuits on September 5, 2019, during his recent trip to Mozambique
in which the pope suggested that certain Evangelical Protestants in the United
States “cannot really be defined as Christian.”
“Two important articles in Civiltà Cattolica have been published in
this regard. I recommend them to you. They were written by Father Spadaro and
the Argentinean Presbyterian pastor, Marcelo Figueroa. The first article spoke
of the ‘ecumenism of hatred.’ The second was on the ‘theology of prosperity,’”
the pontiff said.
“Reading them you will see that there are sects that cannot really be
defined as Christian. They preach Christ, yes, but their message is not
Christian,” the pope said. “It has nothing to do with the preaching of a
Lutheran or any other serious evangelical Christianity.”
In the first essay recommended by the pope, the authors, who are both
friends of Francis, slammed conservative Christians in the U.S. as ignorant,
theocratic, Manichean, war-mongering fanatics.
For the “Evangelical right,” the authors proposed, the panorama of threats
to the American way of life “have included modernist spirits, the black civil
rights movement, the hippy movement, communism, feminist movements and so on.
And now in our day there are the migrants and the Muslims.”
The authors did not hesitate to suggest that many Evangelicals are southern
racists who reject climate change.
“Another interesting aspect is the relationship with creation of these
religious groups that are composed mainly of whites from the deep American
South,” the article stated. “There is a sort of ‘anesthetic’ with regard to
ecological disasters and problems generated by climate change. They profess
‘dominionism’ and consider ecologists as people who are against the Christian
Throughout the essay, the authors criticize a string of exclusively
Republican presidents as being tainted by the teachings of Evangelical
Protestantism. The list of those mentioned includes Richard Nixon, Ronald
Reagan, George W. Bush, and, of course, Donald Trump.
One of the most serious evils of American Evangelical Christians, the
article stated, is “the defense of religious liberty,’” which takes the form of
“a direct virtual challenge to the secularity of the state.”
The authors went on to denounce the ecumenical alliance between conservative
Catholics and Evangelical Christians who align behind certain moral issues in
the public square.
“Some who profess themselves to be Catholic express themselves in ways that
until recently were unknown in their tradition and using tones much closer to
Evangelicals. They are defined as value voters as far as attracting
electoral mass support is concerned,” the article asserted.
This poisonous alliance over shared objectives “happens around such themes
as abortion, same-sex marriage, religious education in schools and other
matters generally considered moral or tied to values,” the essay claimed, which
unite Catholics and Evangelicals in “the nostalgic dream of a theocratic type
At the time of its publication, the article triggered an avalanche of critical
responses denouncing the ignorance and political ill-will underlying the essay.
Philadelphia Archbishop Charles J. Chaput, for instance, wrote a sharp criticism of the essay, saying that the authors were
guilty of “dumbing down and inadequately presenting the nature of
Catholic/evangelical cooperation on religious freedom and other key issues.”
“Dismissing today’s attacks on religious liberty as a ‘narrative of fear,’”
as the La Civiltà Cattolica article does, Chaput said,
“sounds willfully ignorant.”
In his critique of the article, Dr. Samuel Gregg called the
article “disturbing,” while lamenting the tacit anti-Americanism and
“distinctly amateur grasp of American religious history.”
As Dr. Gregg noted, to describe “Marxism-Leninism, Islamist jihadism, or
National Socialism” as evil is not evidence of a Manichaean worldview.
“It is simply recognition that some ideas are indeed wicked and lead to many
people, even nations, engaging in gravely evil acts.”
Moreover, Gregg wrote, if one looks at statements put together by various
scholars and intellectuals involved in movements such as Evangelicals and
Catholics Together, “they contain not a shred of theocratic aspiration.”
“The ecumenical discussion between those involved in these endeavors have
led over time to genuine fruit in terms of clarification of points in common,
removing misconceptions, identifying real doctrinal road-blocks, and
identifying areas where practical work to promote the common good can be
pursued together,” Gregg observed.
It is not a theocratic nostalgia that leads Evangelical and Catholic
Christians in America to make the argument that “unborn human beings are
entitled to the same protections from the unjust use of lethal force as any other
human being, or that religious liberty is more than just freedom of worship, or
that parents are entitled to insist that their children not be subjected to the
nonsense of ‘gender theory’ at school,” Gregg added.
The published criticisms of the original article by serious scholars, both
Christian and secular, ended up being so numerous they could fill a book. The
article was eventually dismissed as simply an embarrassing attempt at political
propaganda by overly zealous Italian and Argentinian clerics who were
completely out of their depth.
Which could lead one to wonder what Pope Francis could possibly be thinking
when he dredges up this ill-begotten essay out of the swamp of oblivion to
recommend it as a useful aid for understanding America’s complex religious
“The United States is founded on the principle that our rights do not come from government they come from God,” President Donald Trump said. “This immortal truth is proclaimed in our Declaration of Independence and enshrined in the first amendment to our Constitution’s Bill of Rights.” Trump noted that 80 percent of the world’s population live in countries where religious freedom is in danger or outright banned, and called for the world to end religious persecution and release prisoners held for professing their belief.
Donald Trump led a United Nations event promoting religious freedom on Monday,
reminding world leaders that all rights came from God.
President Trump today had the attention of nearly all the leaders of the free
world, and he had a message for each and every one of them. In a stunning
rebuke, President Trump reminded his listeners, many of them leaders on nations
that persecute Christians, that human rights ‘come from God’ and as such cannot
be taken away. Trump went on to say protecting religious freedom was one of his
highest priorities. What an incredible polar opposite from the previous
president’s constant promotion of Islam and Sharia Law.
“Therefore wait ye upon
me, saith the LORD, until the day that I rise up to the prey: for my
determination is to gather the nations, that I may assemble the
kingdoms, to pour upon them mine indignation, even all my fierce anger: for
all the earth shall be devoured with the fire of my jealousy.” Zephaniah 3:8
The fact that the United Nations exists,
as the end times gathering of all the nations of the world, leaps off the pages
of Bible prophecy where God say that His desire is to ‘gather the nations’ and
to ‘assemble the kingdoms’, so that He may judge them for their rejection of
Him. Think about that the next time you read any story about the UN. They exist
as a unified body because God says in the last days all the nations of the
world will be ‘gathered together’. Yet another end times prophecy in the
Trump at the United Nations: Human Rights Come from God, Not Government
FROM BREITBART NEWS: “The United States is founded on the principle that our
rights do not come from government they come from God,” he said. “This immortal
truth is proclaimed in our Declaration of Independence and enshrined in the
first amendment to our Constitution’s Bill of Rights.”
Trump noted that 80 percent of the world’s population live in countries
where religious freedom is in danger or outright banned, and called for the
world to end religious persecution and release prisoners held for professing
“As president, protecting religious
freedom is one of my highest priorities and always has been,” Trump said.
president noted sadly that an estimated 11 Christians are killed every day
around the world for following their faith.
“Our Founders understood that no
right is more fundamental to a peaceful, prosperous, and virtuous society than
the right to follow one’s religious convictions,” he said.
Trump vowed that the United States would always stand for religious
freedom, and urged all governments to do the same.
“We ask the governments of the world
to honor the eternal right of every person to follow their conscience, live by
their faith, and give glory to God,” he said.
Trump was introduced at the event by Vice President Mike Pence, who thanked the
president for being the first United States president to lead an event on the
United Nations on religious freedom.
Pence specifically called out ISIS
terrorists, and countries such as Iran, China, Nicaragua, and Venezuela for
their abuses against people of different faiths.
The announcement of the Abrahamic Family House, on the
Saadiyat Island in Abu Dhabi, follows a visit by Pope Francis to the UAE in
February, the first by a pope to the Arabian Peninsula. During the trip, the
pope signed a joint declaration with the grand imam of al-Azhar, Dr. Ahmed
el-Tayeb, that called for religious tolerance and dialogue. An interfaith
council to oversee projects advancing tolerance was formed as a result of the
declaration, and named the Higher Committee of Human Fraternity. The Abrahamic
Family House is its first initiative.
The United Arab Emirates will build a new synagogue as part of an Chrislam
interfaith compound that will also house a mosque and church and is reportedly
set to open in 2022.
As far as advancing the end times timeline goes, 2019 has
been a banner year for Pope Francis and the coming One World Religion. We told
you back in February that the pope has travelled to Abu Dhabi where he met with
Sunni Muslim leader Sheikh Ahmed al-Tayeb. There the two
men signed a global peace covenant called the Document
On Human Fraternity For World Peace. From that covenant, the
Higher Committee of Human Fraternity was created to implement this end times
religious peace treaty. Now that committee has announced that there will be a
fancy new headquarters for this endeavor. The shiny, new center of global
Chrislam opening in 2022.
“Because ye have said, We have made a covenant with
death, and with hell are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall
pass through, it shall not come unto us: for we have made lies our refuge, and
under falsehood have we hid ourselves: Therefore thus saith the Lord GOD,
Behold, I lay in Zion for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious
corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believeth shall not make
haste.” Isaiah 28:15,16 (KJV)
The end times are unfolding before our very eyes, people,
things are speeding up very quickly, if you blink you’ll miss it. This is
Chrislam, it will be the foundation of the coming One World Religion the Bible
says will assemble in the last days. The Catholic Church will call the shots,
and Islam will provide the muscle with their tens of millions of jihad
warriors, now they will be martyrs for Chrislam under the command of a Roman
king. Don’t believe it? You’re watching it.
UAE To Open Chrislam Interfaith Headquarters In 2022
FROM THE TIMES OF ISRAEL: The announcement of the Abrahamic
Family House, on the Saadiyat Island in Abu Dhabi, follows a visit by Pope
Francis to the UAE in February, the first by a pope to the Arabian Peninsula.
During the trip, the pope signed a joint declaration with the grand imam of
al-Azhar, Dr. Ahmed el-Tayeb, that called for religious tolerance and dialogue.
An interfaith council to oversee projects advancing
tolerance was formed as a result of the declaration, and named the Higher
Committee of Human Fraternity. The Abrahamic Family House is its first
“This is an important opportunity for
all who believe in the power of faith and humanity. It will help build bridges
between religious leaders and communities as well as foster peace and harmony
in an era that is too often defined by difference,” said Rabbi M. Bruce Lustig,
senior rabbi at Washington Hebrew Congregation, and a Jewish representative of
The design for the Abrahamic
Family House, by the renowned architect David Adjaye, was
unveiled during a meeting in New York this week, the second for the committee.
According to Gulf News, it will take three years to complete.
The UAE is already home to a synagogue, in Dubai, formed in 2008. Though it
receives quiet support from the Emirati authorities, its members have
largely kept a low profile. The new state-sanctioned synagogue
would mark a significant step forward for public worship of Judaism in the Gulf
In May, Rabbi Yehuda Sarna, the chaplain at New York University, became the
first chief rabbi of the Jewish community of the United Arab Emirates.
When you have done things a certain way for almost your
entire career, it can be exceedingly difficult to admit that you were
wrong. This is true in any field, but it is especially true for those in
the ministry. So Benny Hinn showed an enormous amount of courage when he
completely repudiated the “prosperity gospel” on Monday night during a Facebook Live
broadcast. This represents a 180 degree turn for his ministry,
and it could be a watershed moment for American evangelical Christianity as a
whole. For decades, an extreme emphasis on wealth and prosperity has
virtually drowned out the message of the cross on Christian television, and
this has greatly damaged the evangelical movement. Having high profile
leaders such as Benny Hinn renounce the “prosperity gospel” would do much to
heal the damage that has been done, and he should be greatly applauded for his
Of course a lot of people out there are going to be skeptical, and that is
unfortunate. Forgiveness is available to everyone no matter what they may
have been through in the past, and we should all remember that there is
literally nobody alive that is not in need of grace.
In addition, it is important to remember that ministries are always going to
need resources in order to fulfill the Great Commission, and believers should
always be supporting those ministries that are doing a great job of preaching
the gospel. But the “prosperity gospel” twisted what the Bible says about
giving into a message that appealed to the flesh, and Benny Hinn has now
completely rejected that message. The following comes from the Christian Post…
Declaring that the “Holy Ghost is just fed up with it,” controversial
televangelist Benny Hinn, formerly one of the most aggressive proponents of the
prosperity gospel, has for the first time in his career, delivered a
full-throated rejection of the practice that made him and his family millions.
The prosperity gospel teaches, among other things, that believers have a
right to the blessings of health and wealth, and they can obtain these
blessings through positive confessions of faith and the “sowing of seeds”
through the faithful payments of tithes and offerings.
And Hinn didn’t stop there.
At one point during his Monday night message, he boldly declared that the
prosperity gospel is literally making him “sick to my stomach”…
He said that “it is an offense to the Lord, it’s an
offense to say, ‘Give $1,000.’ I think it’s offense to the Holy Spirit to place
a price on the Gospel. I’m done with it.”
At one point Hinn asked viewers “Am I shocking you?”
“Giving has become such a gimmick it’s making me
sick to my stomach,” he said. “And I’ve been sick for a while too, I just
couldn’t say it.”
We definitely need a lot more of that sort of preaching in our churches.
In the end, this could result in Benny Hinn not being invited on Christian
television as much. As we have seen, there have certainly been other
prominent Christian ministers that have paid a great price for telling the
truth in recent years. But Hinn is doing what is right for himself, his
followers and for the American church as a whole, and that is what matters.
After all this time, Hinn says that the way he views “prosperity” has
completely changed. During his message, he pointed out that the great
heroes in the Bible didn’t have lots of wealth…
“Did Elijah the prophet have a car? No. Did not even have a bicycle. He had
no lack. … Did Jesus drive a car or live in a mansion? No. He had no lack. How
about the Apostles? None lacked among them,” Hinn said. “Today, the idea is
abundance and palatial homes and cars and bank accounts. The focus is wrong …
It’s so wrong.”
Hopefully thousands of other Christian leaders will see what Hinn has done
and will follow his lead. He continues to be highly influential in the
evangelical Christian world, and what he just did is likely to send shockwaves
all across the country.
It would have been really easy for Hinn to continue to preach the prosperity
gospel, because that is what he has done throughout almost his entire career.
Toward the end of the clip the 66-year-old told viewers, “I
don’t want to get to heaven and be rebuked. I think it’s time we say it like
its: The Gospel is not for sale.”
I understand that this article is highly controversial, and I also understand
that many will criticize me for writing it and that many will continue to
deeply criticize Benny Hinn for things he has done throughout the course of his
But it isn’t how we begin the race that matters.
What really matters is how we end the race, and Benny Hinn should be
greatly, greatly applauded for setting himself on a new path
Cooper was expressing his deep concerns about so-called Christian leaders
who are openly renouncing their faith and others who are turning their backs on
“We are in a dangerous place when the
church is looking to 20-year-old worship singers as our source of truth,”
he wrote. “We now have a church culture that learns who God is from
singing modern praise songs rather than from the teachings of the Word.”
Amen, brother! Preach!
“We must STOP making worship leaders and thought leaders or influencers
or cool people or ‘relevant’ people the most influential people in
Christendom,” he wrote.
Over the past few weeks the Christian community has been rocked by
revelations that Joshua Harris, the author of “I Kissed Dating
Goodbye,” had renounced his faith. And most recently, Hillsong’s Marty
Sampson announced his faith in Christ was on “incredibly shaky ground.”
I asked Franklin Graham, the president of Samaritan’s Purse and the Billy
Graham Evangelistic Association, about this weird trend surrounding Christian
leaders and influencers during an interview on my nationally-syndicated radio
“They’re in a very dangerous place to be out from under God’s
protection,” Graham said during an interview on “The Todd Starnes
Radio Show.” “For whatever reason they have decided
they’re going to turn their back on God and God standards.”
Graham said he is especially disturbed by Christians who publicly renounce
their faith in Christ, citing a warning from the Book of Revelation.
“(God) warns churches that turn their back on him and these young men
who have renounced their faith have made it so public,” he said. “Why
did they make it so public? I think they just want publicity. Otherwise, why didn’t
they just leave their faith and just be quiet about it?”
He wondered if the reason why was so that other Christians might join them
and fall away from the teachings of the Bible.
“Shame on them,” Graham said. “You’ll stand before God one
day and give an account to Him.”
Cooper, in his Facebook post, pointed out a “common thread” among the
leaders and influencers who are saying “no one else is talking about the REAL
“This is just flatly false,” he wrote. “I just read today in a renowned
worship leader’s statement, ‘How could a God of love send people to hell? No
one talks about it.’ As if he is the first person to ask this? Brother, you are
not that unique. The church has wrestled with this for 1500 years. Literally.
Everybody talks about it. Children talk about it in Sunday school. There’s like
a billion books written on the topic. Just because you don’t get the answer you
want doesn’t mean that we are unwilling to wrestle with it. We wrestle with
scripture until we are transformed by the renewing of our minds.”
Graham echoed that point during our interview on my radio show.
“I believe the Bible. I believe the Bible to be the Word of God. I believe
every word of the Bible. I do not understand it all but I believe it all,”
We must put our faith in Jesus Christ, not a celebrity influencer. And when
we find ourselves facing difficulties in life, we must turn to the Bible
instead of self-help books.
“I’m going to keep on doing what I do and I’m going to keep telling
people how they can have a relationship with God how they can have their sins
forgiven and how it can make and have that hope of heaven one day by putting
their faith and trust in Jesus Christ.”
And that should be our prayer for Christian “influencers” like Mr. Harris
and Mr. Sampson – that one day they might truly put their faith and trust in
By Jeannie Law, Christian Post Reporter | Thursday, August 15, 2019
John Cooper, lead singer of the Christian rock band Skillet, is speaking out
and expressing dismay over popular Christian leaders publicly renouncing their
“Ok I’m saying it. Because it’s too important not to. What is happening in
Christianity? More and more of our outspoken leaders or influencers who were
once ‘faces’ of the faith are falling away. And at the same time, they are
being very vocal and bold about it. Shockingly they still want to influence
others (for what purpose?)as they announce that they are leaving the faith,”
Cooper wrote in a Facebook post this week.
“I am stunned that the seemingly most important thing for these leaders
who have lost their faith is to make such a bold new stance. Basically saying,
‘I’ve been living and preaching boldly something for 20 years and led
generations of people with my teachings and now I no longer believe
it..therefore I’m going to boldly and loudly tell people it was all wrong while
I boldly and loudly lead people in to my next truth.’ I’m perplexed why they
aren’t embarrassed? Humbled? Ashamed, fearful, confused? Why be so eager to
continue leading people when you clearly don’t know where you are headed?”
Over the last few weeks, former pastor and best-selling author Joshua Harris announced on social media that he no
longer considers himself a Christian, and prolific worship music writer Marty Sampson, known for his extensive work
with Hillsong Church, said he was “genuinely losing” his faith.
Cooper made it clear that it’s not his “place” to judge unbelievers but as a
follower of Christ, he deemed it necessary to address those within his faith,
saying that there must be a measure of “loyalty and friendship and
accountability to each other and the Word of God” as Christians.
While not naming names, Cooper warned all Christians to “STOP making
worship leaders and thought leaders or influencers or cool people or ‘relevant’
people the most influential people in Christendom.” He included himself in the
list of people often put up on a pedestal.
“We are in a dangerous place when the church is looking to 20 year old
worship singers as our source of truth. We now have a church culture that
learns who God is from singing modern praise songs rather than from the
teachings of the Word.”
When it comes to writing songs for Skillet, Cooper — whose band
just released a new album, Victorious —
told The Christian Post that he has “very close relationships” with
his church and that he takes their input seriously.
“We are looked at as a ministry of our church. So they’re very behind
us,” Cooper told CP. “It’s not true that I write a song and I give it to them
for an OK before I release it but it is the case that sometimes I write
something and I say, ‘I don’t know if that’s exactly right and I will look for
New SAT-7 documentary Sequel of Hope broadcasts Myriam and her family’s
message of hope after returning to their hometown of Qaraqosh, Iraq.
“It also is the case if they ever had a problem with something I had
written, we’re such good friends and I respect them so much that they would
tell me and I would take that very seriously.”
His reason for doing so is because of how unsound some Christain music has
become in the church, he explained.
“A lot of Christian people right now, artists are releasing stuff that
when I read the lyrics, I’m like, ‘I’m amazed that people have a problem with
Skillet lyrics’ when some of the songs that we sing in church today I don’t
think are actually accurate,” he stated. “Not to be overly harsh but I am 100%
sure that God’s love is absolutely not reckless in any sort of way. I can’t
believe we sing it in church, but we do!”
Cooper was referencing the very popular worship song “Reckless Love” by Cory
Asbury, which is sung in many churches all over the United States.
He explained that the first time he became aware of the song was when his
11-year-old son told him he had been listening to the lyrics of it and after
reading the Bible he could not find anywhere in the Word where it said
God’s love was “reckless.” His conversation with his son showed
Cooper the importance of proper theology in music.
“I’m not trying to be rude about the song. And I’ve listened to
interviews and I get where it’s coming from. I want to be inclusive to people
but when people look at Skillet lyrics and they go, ‘I’m not really sure if
this is a Christian song? I’m like, ‘Really? And you’re singing the songs
you’re singing [in church]?’
“My point is, we should have a little bit more trepidation before we just
start throwing out stuff in the world,” he told CP.
In his Facebook post, he contended that artists “are good at
communicating emotion and feeling” but they “are not always the best
people to write solid bible truth and doctrine.”
“Sometimes we are too young, too ignorant of scripture, too unaware, or
too unconcerned about the purity of scripture and the holiness of the God we
are singing to. Have you ever considered the disrespect of singing songs to God
that are untrue of His character?” he wrote.
Continuing his argument against the recent public announcements of falling
away from the faith, Cooper wondered, “[W]hy do people act like ‘being
real’ covers a multitude of sins? As if someone is courageous simply for
sharing virally every thought or dark place. That’s not courageous. It’s cavalier.”
“As if they are the harbingers of truth, saying ‘I used to think one
way and practice it and preach it, but now I’ve learned all the new truth and
will start practicing and preaching it.’ So the influencers become the voice
for truth in whatever stage of life and whatever evolution takes place in their
The “Legendary” singer also rejected as “flatly false”
the claim that no one is addressing hard questions in Christianity.
Sampson of Hillsong had argued in his social media announcement that
“no one talks about” contradictions in the Bible, preachers falling,
and why God sends people to Hell, among other things.
“The church has wrestled with this for 1500 years. Literally,”
Cooper argued. “Everybody talks about it. Children talk about it in Sunday
school. There’s like a billion books written on the topic. Just because you
don’t get the answer you want doesn’t mean that we are unwilling to wrestle
with it. We wrestle with scripture until we are transformed by the renewing of
In the end, there’s one thing the Skillet singer finds most shocking:
“As these influencers disavow their faith, they always end their statements
with their ‘new insight/new truth’ that is basically a regurgitation of Jesus’s
words! It’s truly bizarre and ironic. They’ll say ‘I’m disavowing my faith but
remember, love people, be generous, forgive others. Ummm, why? That is actually
not human nature.”
He continued: “No child is ever born and says ‘I just want to love others
before loving myself. I want to turn the other cheek. I want to give my money
away to others in need.’ Those are Bible principles taught by a
prophet/Priest/king of kings who wants us to live by a higher standard which is
not an earthly standard, but rather the ‘Kingdom of God’ standard. Therefore if
Jesus is not the truth and if the Word of God is not absolute, then by
preaching Jesus’s teachings you are endorsing the words of a madman.
“[W]ill your ideas of what is ‘good’ be different from year to year
based on your experience, culture trends, poplular opinion etc and furthermore
will you continue year by year to lead others into your idea of goodness even
though it is not absolute? I’m amazed that so many Christians want the benefits
of the kingdom of God, but with the caveat that they themselves will be the
The Tennessee native pleaded with believers to “rediscover” the preeminence
and the value of the Word of God.
“We need to value truth over feeling. Truth over emotion,” he stated.
“I implore you, please please in your search for relevancy for the
gospel, let us NOT find creative ways to shape Gods word into the image of our
culture by stifling inconvenient truths. But rather let us hold on even tighter
to the anchor of the living Word of God. For He changes NOT.”
Revelation 1:3 "Blessed is the one who reads aloud the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear, and who keep what is written in it, for the time is near".
Watchman for Christ